IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rbfpps/rbf-09-2016-0059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedonic value and crowdfunding project performance: a propensity score matching-based analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Zhao
  • Tsvi Vinig

Abstract

Purpose - In the existing literature on crowdfunding project performance, previous studies have given little attention to the impact of investors’ hedonic value and utilitarian value on project results. In a crowdfunding setting, utilitarian value is somehow hard to satisfy due to information asymmetry and adverse selection problem. Therefore, the projects with more hedonic value can be more attractive for potential investors. Lucky draw is a method to increase consumer hedonic value, and it can influence investors’ behavior as a result. The authors hypothesize that projects with hedonic treatment (lucky draw) may have higher probability to win their campaign than others. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - A unique self-extracted two-year Chinese crowdfunding platform real data set has been applied as the analysis sample. The authors first employ propensity score matching methods to control for the endogeneity of hedonic treatment adoption (lucky draw). The authors then run OLS regression and probit regression in order to test the hypotheses. Findings - The analysis suggests a significant positive relationship not only between project lottery adoption and project results but also between project lottery adoption and project popularity. Originality/value - The results suggest that an often ignored factor – hedonic treatment (lucky draw) – can play an important role in crowdfunding project performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Zhao & Tsvi Vinig, 2017. "Hedonic value and crowdfunding project performance: a propensity score matching-based analysis," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 169-186, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-09-2016-0059
    DOI: 10.1108/RBF-09-2016-0059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-09-2016-0059/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RBF-09-2016-0059/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/RBF-09-2016-0059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang Yuan & Luyao Wang & Xicheng Yin & Hongwei Wang, 2021. "How text sentiment moderates the impact of motivational cues on crowdfunding campaigns," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Ren, Jie & Raghupathi, Viju & Raghupathi, Wullianallur, 2021. "Exploring the subjective nature of crowdfunding decisions," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    3. Maria Kukurba & Aneta Ewa Waszkiewicz & Mariusz Salwin & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Co-Created Values in Crowdfunding for Sustainable Development of Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Zhao, Liang & Shneor, Rotem & Sun, Zhe, 2022. "Skin in the game: Self-funding and reward crowdfunding success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 89-100.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rbfpps:rbf-09-2016-0059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.