IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/qrfmpp/v4y2012i2-3p240-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Syariahaccounting and compliant screening practices

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Soke Fun Ho
  • Omar Masood
  • Asma Abdul Rehman
  • Mondher Bellalah

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to focus on thesyariahcompliant screening methods that are practiced by prominent Islamic finance users, in terms of qualitative and quantitative screening. Design/methodology/approach - This research uses comparative analysis to recognize the similarities and differences of methods among 15 users. Findings - Analysis reveals that there is a need to set the universal standards, not only for the investors but also to discourage the misunderstanding between investors and scholars. After analysis of qualitative and quantitative screening, recommendations for both methods have been made for theshariahcompliant board and users. Originality/value - The paper is useful for Islamic finance users, as well from the academic point of view and is new and unique in its nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Soke Fun Ho & Omar Masood & Asma Abdul Rehman & Mondher Bellalah, 2012. "Syariahaccounting and compliant screening practices," Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(2/3), pages 240-254, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eme:qrfmpp:v:4:y:2012:i:2/3:p:240-254
    DOI: 10.1108/17554171211252556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17554171211252556/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17554171211252556/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/17554171211252556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ho, Catherine Soke Fun & Abd Rahman, Nurul Afiqah & Yusuf, Noor Hafizha Muhamad & Zamzamin, Zaminor, 2014. "Performance of global Islamic versus conventional share indices: International evidence," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 110-121.
    2. Khaled O. Alotaibi & Mohammad M. Hariri, 2021. "Content Analysis of Shariah-Compliant Investment Equity Funds in KSA: Does Social Justice Matter?," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(6), pages 1-1, July.
    3. Md Hakim Ali & Md Akther Uddin & Md. Atiqur Rahman Khan & Blake Goud, 2021. "Faith‐based versus value‐based finance: Is there any portfolio diversification benefit between responsible and Islamic finance?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5570-5583, October.
    4. Abdullah Muhammad Ahmed Ayedh & Muhammad Iqmal Hisham Kamaruddin & Amir Shaharuddin, 2019. "Challenging the Current Shariah Screening Methodology Assessments in Kuala Lumpur Shariah Index (KLSI)," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(4), pages 253-268, October.
    5. Khaled O. Alotaibi & Christine Helliar & Nongnuch Tantisantiwong, 2022. "Competing Logics in the Islamic Funds Industry: A Market Logic Versus a Religious Logic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 207-230, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:qrfmpp:v:4:y:2012:i:2/3:p:240-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.