Author
Listed:
- Charl de Villiers
- John Dumay
Abstract
Purpose - – This article aims to focus on areas that can potentially improve a manuscript’s chances of success, i.e. acceptance for publication. In particular, we deal with topic selection, as well as aspects that can improve the manuscript during the writing phase, including the style of prose and citations. Design/methodology/approach - – Recommendations are based on a review of the literature and our own experience. To demonstrate the practical application of the issues that need to be dealt with, examples have been provided from research articles published during 2010 inAccounting, Organizations and Society(AOS) andAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal(AAAJ). Findings - – There are some common reasons for rejection that can be avoided, but one of the most important issues is to ensure that the research question is novel and that this novelty is made explicit in the introduction to the manuscript. The novelty–rigour curve (or NR curve) is introduced and the relationship between novelty and rigour, as it relates to a manuscript’s likelihood of acceptance for publication, is explained. The assessment of the prose used in published articles reveals that there are no set rules. Research limitations/implications - – This article does not reveal guaranteed recipes for success, except that careful consideration and motivation of the novelty and rigour of the research undertaken are important. The authors suggest research into reviewer behavioural aspects as a possible avenue for future research. Originality/value - – The novelty-rigour curve that depicts and explains the requirements of, and relationship between, these two research attributes is introduced. This article is novel because the prose of research articles published inAOSandAAAJis critically examine in an attempt to assist both early career researchers to break into the top tier of accounting journals and established academics to enhance their chances of success. As such, the article has practical value for accounting academics and may also stimulate discussion among reviewers, editorial board members and editors, thereby playing a role in developing the field of accounting academic publishing.
Suggested Citation
Charl de Villiers & John Dumay, 2014.
"Writing an article for a refereed accounting journal,"
Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(3), pages 324-350, November.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:parpps:par-08-2012-0033
DOI: 10.1108/PAR-08-2012-0033
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Guénin, Henri & Gendron, Yves & Morales, Jérémy, 2024.
"The diktat of concision: When accounting for words shrinks academic knowledge,"
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
- Paola Ramassa & Francesco Avallone & Alberto Quagli, 2024.
"Can “publishing game” pressures affect the research topic choice? A survey of European accounting researchers,"
Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 507-542, June.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:parpps:par-08-2012-0033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.