IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/jaarpp/v9y2008i3p148-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adoption of value‐based management in large UK companies

Author

Listed:
  • S. Cooper
  • D. Crowther

Abstract

Purpose - In the 1990s, a growing number of companies adopted value‐based management (VBM) techniques in the UK. The purpose of this paper is to explore the motivations for the adoption or non‐adoption of VBM for managing a business. Design/methodology/approach - An interview‐based study of 37 large UK companies. Insights from diffusion theory and institutional theory are utilised to theorise these motivations. Findings - It was found that the rate of adoption of VBM in the sample companies does follow the classical S‐shape. It also suggests that the supply‐side of the diffusion process, most notably the role played by consultants, was an influence on many companies. This was not, however, a sufficient condition for companies to adopt the technique. The research also finds evidence of relocation diffusion, as several adopters are influenced by new officers, for example chief executive officers and finance directors, importing VBM techniques that they have used in organizations within which they have previously worked. Research limitations/implications - It is quite a small scale study and further work would be needed to develop the findings. Practical implications - Understanding and theorising the adoption of new management techniques will help understand the management of a business. Originality/value - This research adds further evidence to the value of studying management accounting, and more specifically management accounting change, in practice. It shows the developments in the adoption of a new technique and hence how a technique becomes accepted in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Cooper & D. Crowther, 2008. "The adoption of value‐based management in large UK companies," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(3), pages 148-167, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:9:y:2008:i:3:p:148-167
    DOI: 10.1108/09675420810919711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09675420810919711/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/09675420810919711/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/09675420810919711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corinne Perraudin & Héloïse Petit & Antoine Rebérioux, 2007. "Marché boursier et gestion de l'emploi : Analyse sur données d'entreprises françaises," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne r07041, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Neil Conway & Simon Deakin & Suzanne Konzelmann & Héloïse Petit & Antoine Rebérioux & Frank Wilkinson, 2008. "The Influence of Stock Market Listing on Human Resource Management: Evidence for France and Britain," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(4), pages 631-673, December.
    3. Christ, Katherine L. & Burritt, Roger L., 2016. "ISO 14051: A new era for MFCA implementation and research," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-9.
    4. Sebastian Firk & Torben Schmidt & Michael Wolff, 2019. "Exploring Value‐Based Management Sophistication: The Role of Potential Economic Benefits and Institutional Influence," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 418-450, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:jaarpp:v:9:y:2008:i:3:p:148-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.