IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/caerpp/v5y2013i2p248-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project design, village governance and infrastructure quality in rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Chengfang Liu
  • Linxiu Zhang
  • Jikun Huang
  • Renfu Luo
  • Hongmei Yi
  • Yaojiang Shi
  • Scott Rozelle

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to explain why the quality of infrastructure projects in rural China differs from village to village and how project quality is correlated with project design attributes and governance factors. Design/methodology/approach - Using primary data collected by the authors on three types of infrastructure projects in villages across China, they created measures of project quality for each village. They then used both descriptive and multivariate approaches to examine how quality varies from village to village and factors correlated with quality. Findings - Between-project within-village quality differences are small and project design has little explanatory power. Between-village variations are large. There are strong correlations between the ways villages govern themselves and project quality. The authors conclude that it is difficult to make good projects work in communities that lack good governance. Originality/value - Disaggregated data on the quality of infrastructure (and its determinants) were collected by the authors to allow for variation in the type of infrastructure projects (roads, irrigation, and drinking water) and variation in village governance, making it possible to identify and contrast the effects of project design and village governance factors on project quality. As its chief contribution, this work identifies potential ways to improve the quality of infrastructure projects in rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengfang Liu & Linxiu Zhang & Jikun Huang & Renfu Luo & Hongmei Yi & Yaojiang Shi & Scott Rozelle, 2013. "Project design, village governance and infrastructure quality in rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 248-280, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:caerpp:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:248-280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/17561371311331124?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:caerpp:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:248-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: http://www.emeraldinsight.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.