Author
Listed:
- Niklas Kreander
- Ken McPhail
- Vivien Beattie
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to explore whether, how and why ethical investment practices of charities differ between two countries with quite different ideological and institutional frameworks – Norway and the UK. Design/methodology/approach - – The paper uses mixed methods and a cross-sectional field study design to explore the ethical investment practices of 300 of the largest charities by investments in the UK and Norway. Practices are theorized using the dual lens of institutional theory and social origins theory. Findings - – The paper provides evidence on why charities established the practice of ethical investment. The results show that large charities were more likely to have an ethical policy; that charities with moderate public sector funding were more likely to have an ethical policy. In line with institutional theory some Norwegian charities with public sector funding mimic the policy of the Government Pension Fund, and the ethical investment policy of Norwegian charities was more influenced by donors. Institutional entrepreneurs (charity founders) had a more prominent influence in UK charities. Research limitations/implications - – The paper highlights that more research is needed on sovereign wealth funds, their investment practices and how they affect charities. Practical implications - – The findings of this paper highlight the potential role that the ethical investment practices of sovereign can play a soft regulatory function in changing the behaviour of other investors. Social implications - – To the extent that ethical investment practices are construed as having a positive social impact, then this study shows how a government sovereign wealth fund can influence the spread of ethical investment practices. Originality/value - – This paper, which sits at the nexus of the charity and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literatures, contributes by responding to calls for more research on charity practices in different countries and CSR practices in different countries. This comparison also contributes to the development of institutional theory by shedding light on the institutional influence of a sovereign wealth fund and its impact on others. The paper will be of value to academics, policy setters and regulators.
Suggested Citation
Niklas Kreander & Ken McPhail & Vivien Beattie, 2015.
"Charity ethical investments in Norway and the UK,"
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(4), pages 581-617, May.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:28:y:2015:i:4:p:581-617
DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2012-1113
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- George Giannopoulos & Renate Victoria Kihle Fagernes & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Kazi Abul Bashar Muhammad Afzal Hossain, 2022.
"The ESG Disclosure and the Financial Performance of Norwegian Listed Firms,"
JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, May.
- Jiafeng Gu, 2023.
"Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Spatial Context and Effect Mechanism,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, January.
- Migliavacca, Milena & Patel, Ritesh & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Goodell, John W., 2022.
"Mapping impact investing: A bibliometric analysis,"
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aaajpp:v:28:y:2015:i:4:p:581-617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.