IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Theory" and "Models": Terminology Through the Looking Glass


  • Robert S. Goldfarb
  • Jon Ratner


Klein and Romero’s (2007, Econ Journal Watch) use of the terms “theory†and “model†seems at considerable variance from other common uses, suggesting that divergent usage by economist-authors may confront readers with substantial ambiguity. Clarity and understanding can be enhanced by sorting out the competing uses of these terms. This paper first sets forth and examines Klein-Romero’s use of “theory†and “model†. Second, it compares their usage with several quite different if not antithetical examples in the literature. Third, it provides a tentative classification scheme of model-types to capture the range of usages of this term in economics. Our thesis is that the terms “theory†and “model†are incapable of carrying the diverse characteristics different economists ascribe to them. Descriptive clarity may require more than just two terms. Our classificatory scheme tries to shed light on this possibility, at least for models.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert S. Goldfarb & Jon Ratner, 2008. ""Theory" and "Models": Terminology Through the Looking Glass," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 5(1), pages 91-108, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:91-108

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Justin Bledin & Sharon Shewmake, 2001. "Research programs, model-building and actor-network-theory: Reassessing the case of the Leontief Paradox," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 455-476.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    models; model building; theory; explanation; explanandum; story telling; relevance; importance;

    JEL classification:

    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:91-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jason Briggeman). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.