IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ejw/journl/v11y2014i2p166-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Notes of an Atheist on Economics and Religion

Author

Listed:
  • Jayati Ghosh

Abstract

Mainstream economics is constrained by methodological individualism, which ignores many aspects of human existence and interaction. Methodological individualism itself propagates certain attitudes and outlooks that can become self-fulfilling by channelling human behaviour into the simplistic straitjacket of self-interest. A sense of ethics and therefore of spirituality is necessary to understand the complexities of human and social behaviour as well as to ground economic policy advice in a fundamental morality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayati Ghosh, 2014. "Notes of an Atheist on Economics and Religion," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 11(2), pages 166-169, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:166-169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/File+download/815/GhoshMay2014.pdf?mimetype=pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://econjwatch.org/930
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hollis,, 2007. "Rational Economic Man," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521033886.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie, Yun, 2020. "Responding to requests for help: Effects of payoff schemes with small monetary units," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Somayeh Koohborfardhaghighi & Jorn Altmann, 2016. "How Network Visibility and Strategic Networking Leads to the Emergence of Certain Network Characteristics: A Complex Adaptive System Approach," TEMEP Discussion Papers 2016130, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised Aug 2016.
    3. Luca Iandoli & Ivana Quinto & Anna De Liddo & Simon Buckingham Shum, 2016. "On online collaboration and construction of shared knowledge: Assessing mediation capability in computer supported argument visualization tools," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1052-1067, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Neoclassical economics; ethics; value judgements; economic policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ejw:journl:v:11:y:2014:i:2:p:166-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jason Briggeman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.