IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ege/journl/v17y2017i2p243-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Web Design Firms with the ORESTE Method

Author

Listed:
  • Esra AYTAC ADALI

    (Pamukkale Universitesi)

  • Aysegul TUS ISIK

    (Pamukkale Universitesi)

Abstract

Developing a website, creating an online presence and a brand image are difficult for the companies because of requiring research, thought and time. One of the ways to overcome this difficulty is hiring a web design firm. There are many web design firms in the market and it is critical to determine which one best meets a company’s needs. In this paper one of the MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) techniques, called ORESTE (Organization, Rangement Et Synthese De Donnes Relationnelles), has been applied to the selection of web design firm. This method is simple and does not require the quantification of criteria weights and alternatives, rather only their ordinal rankings. The application has demonstrated that the ORESTE method provides a structured, rational and consistent approach to complex decision problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Esra AYTAC ADALI & Aysegul TUS ISIK, 2017. "Ranking Web Design Firms with the ORESTE Method," Ege Academic Review, Ege University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 17(2), pages 243-254.
    • Handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:243-254
    DOI: 10.21121/eab.2017225202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/MakaleDosyalari/51/PDF2017_2_7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.onlinedergi.com/eab/arsiv/arsivDetay.aspx?yil=2017&peryot=2
    File Function: Website of the journal issue
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21121/eab.2017225202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delhaye, C. & Teghem, J. & Kunsch, P., 1991. "Application of the ORESTE method to a nuclear waste management problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1-2), pages 29-39, November.
    2. Ayşegül Tuş Işık, 2016. "QUALIFLEX and ORESTE Methods for the Insurance Company Selection Problem," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 4(2), pages 55-68, September.
    3. Hassan Jafari, 2013. "Identification and Prioritization of Grain Discharging Operations Risks by Using ORESTE Method," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 233-245, September.
    4. De Leeneer, Isabelle & Pastijn, Hugo, 2002. "Selecting land mine detection strategies by means of outranking MCDM techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 327-338, June.
    5. Hassan Jafari, 2013. "Identification and Prioritization of Grain Discharging Operations Risks by Using ORESTE Method," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(9), pages 233-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Keyou Shi & Yong Liu & Weizhang Liang, 2022. "An Extended ORESTE Approach for Evaluating Rockburst Risk under Uncertain Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Cheng Zhang & Xingli Wu & Di Wu & Huchang Liao & Li Luo & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2018. "An Intuitionistic Multiplicative ORESTE Method for Patients’ Prioritization of Hospitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Çiğdem Sıcakyüz & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Is E-Trust a Driver of Sustainability? An Assessment of Turkish E-Commerce Sector with an Extended Intuitionistic Fuzzy ORESTE Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burcu Yılmaz Kaya & Aylin Adem & Metin Dağdeviren, 2020. "A DSS-Based Novel Approach Proposition Employing Decision Techniques for System Design," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 413-445, March.
    2. Çiğdem Sıcakyüz & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Is E-Trust a Driver of Sustainability? An Assessment of Turkish E-Commerce Sector with an Extended Intuitionistic Fuzzy ORESTE Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, July.
    3. Behzadian, Majid & Kazemzadeh, R.B. & Albadvi, A. & Aghdasi, M., 2010. "PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 198-215, January.
    4. Sakai, Kazuki & Hohzaki, Ryusuke & Fukuda, Emiko & Sakuma, Yutaka, 2018. "Risk evaluation and games in mine warfare considering shipcounter effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 300-313.
    5. Jindong Qin & Yingying Liang & Luis Martinez & Alessio Ishizaka & Witold Pedrycz, 2023. "ORESTE-SORT: a novel multiple criteria sorting method for sorting port group competitiveness," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 875-909, June.
    6. Samanlioglu, Funda, 2013. "A multi-objective mathematical model for the industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 332-340.
    7. Armaghan Abed-Elmdoust & Reza Kerachian, 2014. "Evaluating the Relative Power of Water Users in Inter-Basin Water Transfer Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(2), pages 495-509, January.
    8. Araz, Ceyhun & Ozkarahan, Irem, 2007. "Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 585-606, April.
    9. Wenjun Chang & Chao Fu & Nanping Feng & Shanlin Yang, 2021. "Multi-criteria Group Decision Making with Various Ordinal Assessments," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 1285-1314, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ege:journl:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:243-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Baris Gök (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiegetr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.