IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v204y2026ics0305750x26000896.html

Substitute or complement? Quantity–quality effects of agricultural production diversity and market access on diets

Author

Listed:
  • Xuan, Jiaqi
  • Wang, Xiaoxi
  • Yuan, Changzheng
  • Jin, Songqing
  • Tian, Xu

Abstract

In many developing countries, rural households meet their food needs through both self-production and market purchases, but evidence on the relative and joint roles of these channels in shaping dietary diversity and dietary quality remains limited. Using household panel data from rural China spanning 2004–2011, we provide micro-level evidence from a major developing-country context to examine the quantity–quality effects of agricultural production diversity, market access, and their interaction on dietary diversity and dietary quality. Fixed-effect models combined with an instrumental-variable strategy are used to address potential endogeneity. We find that both greater production diversity and improved market access enhance dietary diversity and dietary quality. A one-standard-deviation increase in agricultural production diversity raises the dietary diversity score and the Chinese Healthy Eating Index by 0.5 and 0.71 standard deviations, respectively. Similarly, reducing the distance to markets by one standard deviation increases both outcomes by 0.03 standard deviations. Further analysis reveals an overall substitution relationship between production diversity and market access in improving dietary outcomes. The marginal contribution of production diversity on dietary diversity and quality diminishes as market access improves, and vice versa. At the food-group level, however, functional complementarity exists between these two channels for soybeans and nuts, vegetables, and aquatic products. Diversified production supports higher intake of these foods when market access is limited, while better market access attenuates reliance on self-produced items by expanding access to a broader set of foods. Taken together, the findings highlight the continued importance of agricultural production diversification in improving diets where markets are thin, and underscore the critical role of improving market conditions, particularly in regions such as Africa and South Asia with persistently high market frictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuan, Jiaqi & Wang, Xiaoxi & Yuan, Changzheng & Jin, Songqing & Tian, Xu, 2026. "Substitute or complement? Quantity–quality effects of agricultural production diversity and market access on diets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0305750x26000896
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X26000896
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0305750x26000896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.