IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v117y2018icp13-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining suitability of the integrated public transport system: A case study of Lahore

Author

Listed:
  • Aziz, A.
  • Nawaz, M.S.
  • Nadeem, M.
  • Afzal, L.

Abstract

City administration has given prime importance to public transport services in Lahore. But still desired level of convenience and efficiency has not been achieved because of the absence of any integrated public transport system. Metrobus, LTC operated buses and Qingqi Rickshaws are all operating through their independent schedules with least consideration to that of others. Travellers using more than one modes of transport for their complete trip do not find whole system well harmonized. There is a need to find whether integration of currently independently operating transport systems can bring any improvements in services. This research work significantly points out short comings in city’s existing transport system; quantifies the impact of related factors through chi-square, co-relation and other statistical analyses; and provides some policy guidelines for pragmatic improvements in the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Aziz, A. & Nawaz, M.S. & Nadeem, M. & Afzal, L., 2018. "Examining suitability of the integrated public transport system: A case study of Lahore," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 13-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:13-25
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416304517
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bansal, Prateek & Gadepalli, Ravi & AitBihiOuali, Laila, 2023. "Eliciting mobility preferences of Indians for E-rickshaws: Evidence from Gurugram," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-30.
    2. Thembani Moyo & Alain Y Kibangou & Walter Musakwa, 2021. "Societal context-dependent multi-modal transportation network augmentation in Johannesburg, South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Jungyeol Hong & Reuben Tamakloe & Soobeom Lee & Dongjoo Park, 2019. "Exploring the Topological Characteristics of Complex Public Transportation Networks: Focus on Variations in Both Single and Integrated Systems in the Seoul Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Muhammad Safdar & Arshad Jamal & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi & Muhammad Tauhidur Rahman & Meshal Almoshaogeh, 2022. "Analysis of the Influential Factors towards Adoption of Car-Sharing: A Case Study of a Megacity in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Farhan Haider & Zia ur Rehman & Ammad Hassan Khan & Maryam Ilyas & Inamullah Khan, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of BRT Standard in Decision Support System for Integrated Transportation Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Muhammad Ashraf Javid & Muhammad Abdullah & Nazam Ali & Syed Arif Hussain Shah & Panuwat Joyklad & Qudeer Hussain & Krisada Chaiyasarn, 2022. "Extracting Travelers’ Preferences toward Electric Vehicles Using the Theory of Planned Behavior in Lahore, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Muhammad Nadeem & Muhammad Azam & Muhammad Asim & Muhammad Ahmad Al-Rashid & Othman Che Puan & Tiziana Campisi, 2021. "Does Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) Meet the Citizens’ Mobility Needs? Evaluating Performance for the Case of Multan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Muhammad Nadeem & Nayab Khaliq & Naseem Akhtar & Muhammad Ahmad Al-Rashid & Muhammad Asim & Merve Kayaci Codur & Enea Mustafaraj & Muhammed Yasin Codur & Farrukh Baig, 2022. "Exploring the Urban Form and Compactness: A Case Study of Multan, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Muhammad Ahmad Al-Rashid & Hong Ching Goh & Yong Adilah Shamsul Harumain & Zulfiqar Ali & Tiziana Campisi & Tahir Mahmood, 2020. "Psychosocial Barriers of Public Transport Use and Social Exclusion among Older Adults: Empirical Evidence from Lahore, Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:117:y:2018:i:c:p:13-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.