IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v68y2022ics0160791x22000483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISCs) in Kenya: Challenges and opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Lugasi, Solomon Omwoma
  • Odhiambo, Mercy Auma

Abstract

Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISCs) were established by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 2009 to support innovations in least developed countries. They facilitate innovators to access high quality innovations and technological information. They have been very successful in the United Kingdom and Germany. TISC implementation in Kenya has been evaluated in this work and challenges experienced determined with suggested mitigations. An evaluation of various intellectual property (IP) in Kenya shows that only 604 patents are registered per year; out of which, 167 are from nationals. Among the registered patents, an average of 5 patents per year is issued to Kenyans and 209 to internationals. There is a positive correlation between application of patents, trademarks, and industrial designs with establishment of TISCs. Three (3) out of 14 TISC centers are fully operational with an equipped office, trained personnel and offer services to innovators. Eleven centers are still ideas in the minds of center leaders. Kenya Industrial Property Institute (KIPI) and WIPO have trained all the center leaders on their mandates. Eleven (11) out of 14 centers cited financial constraints and non-committal administrations. Only 3 centers have financial benefit from IP. Eleven centers (11) are yet to implement their mandate fully and IP is mainly for staff development and branding. Incubation centers are rare and even difficult to get prototypes of the registered patents or designs. Furthermore, there is lack of IP audit and valuation. As such, prioritization of various IP by institutions for implementation is rare. On average, implementation of TISCs in Kenya is at 62%. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis of the findings reveals a young, experienced, intelligent and enthusiastic staff that is limited by resources (funds), facilities, lack of entrepreneurial skills and ignorance. However, they are exposed to several willing government agencies including the Kenya National Innovation Agency (KeNIA) and Kenya National Research Fund (NRF). Nevertheless, external threats including pandemics (COVID 19) have impacted negatively on their implementation strategies. A business canvas model for the TISCs reveal their key partners to be NRF, KeNIA, innovators, companies, research institutions, learning institutions, small and medium enterprises, WIPO, KIPI etc. They can derive their own resources from external funding bodies, the government, and levy their services. It is, therefore, recommend that TISCs be hosted by learning institutions, financed by Kenya government with set objectives and be treated as businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Lugasi, Solomon Omwoma & Odhiambo, Mercy Auma, 2022. "Implementation of Technology and Innovation Support Centers (TISCs) in Kenya: Challenges and opportunities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000483
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22000483
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kamath, Anant, 2013. "Interactive knowledge exchanges under complex social relations: A simulation model of a developing country cluster," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 294-305.
    2. Halili, Zahra, 2020. "Identifying and ranking appropriate strategies for effective technology transfer in the automotive industry: Evidence from Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Fakhimi, MohammadAmin & Miremadi, Iman, 2022. "The impact of technological and social capabilities on innovation performance: a technological catch-up perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Baraki, Yemane A. & Brent, Alan C., 2013. "Technology transfer of hand pumps in rural communities of Swaziland: Towards sustainable project life cycle management," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 258-266.
    5. Cowan, Robin & Kamath, Anant, 2013. "Interactive knowledge exchanges under complex social relations: A simulation model," MERIT Working Papers 2013-004, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    6. Appiah-Adu, Kwaku & Okpattah, Bernard K. & Djokoto, Justice G., 2016. "Technology transfer, outsourcing, capability and performance: A comparison of foreign and local firms in Ghana," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 31-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Reem Al Sharif & Shaligram Pokharel & Mohamed Arselene Ayari & Marwa Essam & Salwa Aqeel, 2022. "Enabling Open Innovation in Digital Startups through the Incubation Program—A Case of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonmezturk Bolatan, Gulin Idil & Giadedi, Abdulhakim & Daim, Tugrul, 2022. "Innovation leadership through technology transfer: Case of Turkish industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Wang, Nannan & Yao, Shengnan & Wu, Guobin & Chen, Xiaoyan, 2017. "The role of project management in organisational sustainable growth of technology-based firms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 124-132.
    3. Cho, Ji Yeon & Park, Soo Kyung, 2023. "Key factors for sustainable operation of smart rural communities in aging societies: Voices of Korean community leaders," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Hsiao-Fen Hsiao & Tingyong Zhong & Hasan Dincer, 2019. "Analysing Managers’ Financial Motivation for Sustainable Investment Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Samia Nour, 2014. "The Importance (Impacts) of Knowledge at the Macro–Micro Levels in the Arab Gulf Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(3), pages 521-537, September.
    7. Murillo Vetroni Barros & Mariane Bigarelli Ferreira & Guilherme Francisco Prado & Cassiano Moro Piekarski & Claudia Tania Picinin, 2020. "The interaction between knowledge management and technology transfer: a current literature review between 2013 and 2018," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1585-1606, October.
    8. Chenggang Wang, 2022. "Green Technology Innovation, Energy Consumption Structure and Sustainable Improvement of Enterprise Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Attarpour, MohammadReza & Elyasi, Mahdi & Mohammadi, Akbar, 2023. "Patterns of technological capability development in Iran's steel industry: An analysis based on windows of opportunity for technological learning," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    10. Popkova, Elena G. & De Bernardi, Paola & Tyurina, Yuliya G. & Sergi, Bruno S., 2022. "A theory of digital technology advancement to address the grand challenges of sustainable development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Kim, Jong-Seok & Kim, Byung-Keun, 2022. "Examining different technology transfer capabilities and their counterpart works from two different positions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Joao J. M. Ferreira & Cristina Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2019. "The effects of technology transfers and institutional factors on economic growth: evidence from Europe and Oceania," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1505-1528, October.
    13. Nour, Samia Satti Osman Mohamed, 2013. "The importance and impacts of knowledge at the macro-micro levels in the Arab Gulf countries," MERIT Working Papers 2013-016, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    14. Bhattacharjya, Bibhuti Ranjan & Kakoty, Sashindra Kumar & Singha, Siddhartha, 2019. "A feedback mechanism for appropriate technology development and dissemination: Case study approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 104-114.
    15. Tiyas Kurnia Sari & Fitra Roman Cahaya & Corina Joseph, 2021. "Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 495-511, July.
    16. Marti, Luisa & Puertas, Rosa, 2023. "Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Poudeh, Hossein Dehghani & Cheshmberah, Mohsen & Torabi, Hassan & Karimi Gavareshki, Mohammad Hossein & Hosnavi, Reza, 2019. "Determining and prioritizing the factors influencing the outsourcing of Complex Product Systems R&D projects employing ANP and grey-DEMATEL method (case study: Aviation Industries Organization, Iran)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 57-68.
    18. Philip Awino & James M. Kilika & Stephen M.A Muathe, 2022. "Organization health conceptualized as an emergent capability in a public sector reform program:Empirical and practical implications," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(2), pages 16-28, March.
    19. Lu, Jintao & Jia, Xiaorong & Lev, Benjamin & Zhang, Chong & Gao, Yangyang & Zhao, Min & He, Yifan, 2021. "How to understand “salable fake goods” and “unsalable quality goods”? An insight from the view of quality responsibility and consumers’ brand loyalty," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. Song, Sangyoung & Lee, Jongkuk, 2023. "Licensing early-versus late-stage technologies: The licensee perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:68:y:2022:i:c:s0160791x22000483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.