IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v62y2020ics0160791x19305986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring perceived usability of university students towards a student information system (SIS): A Turkish university case

Author

Listed:
  • Demırkol, Denizhan
  • Seneler, Cagla
  • Daım, Tugrul
  • Shaygan, Amir

Abstract

Student Information System (SIS) offers many functions in order to sustain academic workflow. SIS's usability is also important in terms of maintaining its functions. Although user experience of various information systems has been studied in the literature related to perceived usability, this is not the case for the SIS. The aim of this study is examining a SIS's usability through using Turkish version of the System Usability Scale (SUS-TR). In total, 324 undergraduate students responded to SUS-TR. The research was conducted to uncover whether students' perceived usability about a SIS can differ based on their demographic information, their dis/liked features on the SIS or their recommendations for increasing usability of the SIS. According to findings there exists a statistically significant relationship between the age groups of the students and the categorized SUS-TR score groups. Moreover, there is a statistically significant relationship between students' categorized SUS-TR score groups and the most disliked features of the SIS. As a result of this research, it has been found that analyzing users' perceived usability variations amongst different student groups may be valuable because focusing on these variations has the potential to raise user experiences of users with any SIS.

Suggested Citation

  • Demırkol, Denizhan & Seneler, Cagla & Daım, Tugrul & Shaygan, Amir, 2020. "Measuring perceived usability of university students towards a student information system (SIS): A Turkish university case," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x19305986
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X19305986
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olav Eikeland, 2013. "Symbiotic Learning Systems: Reorganizing and Integrating Learning Efforts and Responsibilities Between Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) and Work Places," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(1), pages 98-118, March.
    2. Christopher Durney & Richard Donnelly, 2015. "Managing the Effects of Rapid Technological Change on Complex Information Technology Projects," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 6(4), pages 641-664, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Zhao & Mou, Jian, 2021. "Gender differences in user perception of usability and performance of online travel agency websites," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Heidary Dahooie, Jalil & Raafat, Romina & Qorbani, Ali Reza & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "An intuitionistic fuzzy data-driven product ranking model using sentiment analysis and multi-criteria decision-making," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Yavuz, Merve & Çorbacıoğlu, Eda & Başoğlu, Ahmet Nuri & Daim, Tugrul Unsal & Shaygan, Amir, 2021. "Augmented reality technology adoption: Case of a mobile application in Turkey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erastus Karanja & Aditya Sharma & Ibrahim Salama, 2020. "What does MIS survey research reveal about diversity and representativeness in the MIS field? A content analysis approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1583-1628, March.
    2. Thapa, Janani & Lyford, Conrad & Belasco, Eric J. & McCool, Barent & McCool, Audrey & Pence, Barbara & Carter, Tyra, 2014. "Nudges in the Supermarket: Experience from Point of Sale Signs," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 171442, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Meissner, Dirk & Shmatko, Natalia, 2017. "“Keep open”: the potential of gatekeepers for the aligning universities to the new Knowledge Triangle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 191-198.
    4. Pashaki, Elham Sedighi & Shahroudi, Kambiz & Fadaei, Mehdi, 2016. "Impacts of Strategic Learning Practices on Employees’ Commitment in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Engaged in Agriculture and Protein Food Production Sectors in Guilan Province," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 6(1), March.
    5. Irina-Emily Hansen & Ola Jon Mork & Torgeir Welo & Geir Ringen, 2022. "Bridging the ‘Valley of Death’: Can Agile Principles Be Applied in Industry-Academia Research and Innovation Projects?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(4), pages 3172-3194, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:62:y:2020:i:c:s0160791x19305986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.