IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v192y2023ics0040162523002342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital platforms as common goods or economic goods? Constructing the worth of a nascent agricultural data platform

Author

Listed:
  • Bustamante, Maria J.

Abstract

The potential of digital platforms to deliver on both economic and societal values is contested, with many arguing that economic value is prioritized to the detriment of more social values. Yet, the literature lacks in-depth empirical studies on how these perceptions of worth in the early stage of platform development are developed and settled upon. This paper draws on valuation studies to provide insight into how multiple platform founders construct the worth of a nascent agriculture data-sharing platform in Sweden. Using qualitative methods, the study shows that initially, the platform founders consider a number of values (accessible and transparent data, profitability, sustainability and innovation) that are defined through ‘common good’ and ‘economic good’ aspects. However, the need to articulate the worth to potential funders and partners encourages a reliance on measurable qualities, which subsequently leads to a shift in how values are defined and discussed, foregrounding and backgrounding different values and stakeholders in the process. These insights point to the complexity for firms grappling with economic and social values and highlight the need for the re-evaluation of the frameworks used to determine the value of innovation in the agri-food sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Bustamante, Maria J., 2023. "Digital platforms as common goods or economic goods? Constructing the worth of a nascent agricultural data platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:192:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523002342
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523002342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:192:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523002342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.