IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v83y2013i1p219-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bootstrap based model checks with missing binary response data

Author

Listed:
  • Dikta, Gerhard
  • Subramanian, Sundarraman
  • Winkler, Thorsten

Abstract

Dikta, Kvesic, and Schmidt proposed a model-based resampling scheme to approximate critical values of tests for model checking involving binary response data. Their approach is inapplicable when the binary response variable is not always observed, however. We propose a missingness adjusted marked empirical process under the framework that the missing binary responses are missing at random. We introduce a resampling scheme for the bootstrap and prove its asymptotic validity. We present some numerical comparisons and illustrate our methodology using a real data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Dikta, Gerhard & Subramanian, Sundarraman & Winkler, Thorsten, 2013. "Bootstrap based model checks with missing binary response data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 219-226.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:1:p:219-226
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2012.09.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715212003604
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koul, Hira L. & Yi, Tingting, 2006. "Goodness-of-fit testing in interval censoring case 1," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(7), pages 709-718, April.
    2. W. Stute, 1992. "Strong consistency of the MLE under random censoring," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 257-267, December.
    3. Dikta, Gerhard & Kvesic, Marsel & Schmidt, Christian, 2006. "Bootstrap Approximations in Model Checks for Binary Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 521-530, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:1:p:219-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.