IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v5y1987i1p49-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coefficients of determination for least absolute deviation analysis

Author

Listed:
  • McKean, Joseph W.
  • Sievers, Gerald L.

Abstract

The least-absolute deviation or l1 analysis of a linear model is an important alternative to the classical least squares analysis from the point of view of efficiency for longer-tailed error distributions and robustness to the presence of outliers. In this paper two coefficients of determination are proposed for the least-absolute deviation analysis. It is shown that they have desirable properties as measures of multiple association. Both fixed and random predictor variable cases are considered. In the case of random predictor variables, the sample coefficients of determination are shown to be consistent estimators of appropriate population parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • McKean, Joseph W. & Sievers, Gerald L., 1987. "Coefficients of determination for least absolute deviation analysis," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 49-54, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:5:y:1987:i:1:p:49-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(87)90026-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei, Kaixuan & Chang, Jianxia & Wang, Yimin & Guo, Aijun & Huang, Mengdi & Xu, Bo, 2022. "Cascade hydropower stations short-term operation for load distribution considering water level synchronous variation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 683-693.
    2. Norling, Johannes, 2018. "Measuring heterogeneity in preferences over the sex of children," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 199-221.
    3. Noh, Hohsuk & El Ghouch, Anouar & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2011. "On assessing model adequacy in linear quantile regression," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2011024, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    4. Ranganai, Edmore, 2016. "Quality of fit measurement in regression quantiles: An elemental set method approach," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-25.
    5. Giulio Bottazzi & Marco Grazzi, 2014. "Dynamics Of Productivity And Cost Of Labour In Italian Manufacturing Firms," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(S1), pages 55-73, December.
    6. Sun, Rui-Bo & Wei, Bo-Cheng, 2004. "On influence assessment for LAD regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 97-110, April.
    7. Noh, Hohsuk & El Ghouch, Anouar & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2013. "Assessing model adequacy in possibly misspecified quantile regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 558-569.
    8. Cristophe Croux & Catherine Dehon, 2003. "Estimators of the multiple correlation coefficient: Local robustness and confidence intervals," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 315-334, July.
    9. Cheng, C.-L. & Shalabh, & Garg, G., 2016. "Goodness of fit in restricted measurement error models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 101-116.
    10. Cheng, C.-L. & Shalabh, & Garg, G., 2014. "Coefficient of determination for multiple measurement error models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 137-152.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:5:y:1987:i:1:p:49-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.