IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v233y2026ics0167715226000234.html

On the robustness of maximum likelihood estimators for the Poisson INAR(1) model

Author

Listed:
  • Chattopadhyay, Subhankar
  • Basak, Sancharee
  • Biswas, Atanu

Abstract

This article examines the robustness of maximum likelihood estimators in Poisson integer-valued autoregressive processes of order one, which model count time series with autocorrelation and Poisson-distributed innovations. While maximum likelihood estimation is widely used to estimate the autocorrelation parameter α and the mean parameter λ, its sensitivity to outliers and model deviations remains insufficiently understood. We use influence function theory to quantify the local impact of infinitesimal contamination on the estimators and compute gross error sensitivity to assess worst-case sensitivity. The methodology connects robust statistical ideas with count time series modeling by providing explicit score expressions and estimating Fisher information by simulation under stationarity. Visual diagnostics, including heatmaps, three-dimensional sensitivity surfaces, and summary tables, identify parameter regimes where the estimators become vulnerable to contamination. The study provides practical guidance and diagnostics for applied researchers in the social sciences and epidemiology.

Suggested Citation

  • Chattopadhyay, Subhankar & Basak, Sancharee & Biswas, Atanu, 2026. "On the robustness of maximum likelihood estimators for the Poisson INAR(1) model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:233:y:2026:i:c:s0167715226000234
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2026.110659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715226000234
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2026.110659?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:233:y:2026:i:c:s0167715226000234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.