IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v226y2025ics0167715225001415.html

Distorted expectiles risk measure and LP formulation

Author

Listed:
  • Arcidiacono, Sally Giuseppe
  • Rossello, Damiano

Abstract

Given a concave distortion function, we provide a dual representation of the expectiles based on rank-dependent expected utility theory. With possible application to portfolio management in mind, we also derive an LP formulation of the related optimization problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Arcidiacono, Sally Giuseppe & Rossello, Damiano, 2025. "Distorted expectiles risk measure and LP formulation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:226:y:2025:i:c:s0167715225001415
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2025.110496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715225001415
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2025.110496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    2. Tiantian Mao & Jun Cai, 2018. "Risk measures based on behavioural economics theory," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 367-393, April.
    3. Freddy Delbaen, 2013. "A Remark on the Structure of Expectiles," Papers 1307.5881, arXiv.org.
    4. Richard E. Wendell & Arthur P. Hurter, 1976. "Minimization of a Non-Separable Objective Function Subject to Disjoint Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 643-657, August.
    5. Fabio Bellini & Valeria Bignozzi, 2015. "On elicitable risk measures," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 725-733, May.
    6. Bellini, Fabio & Klar, Bernhard & Müller, Alfred & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2014. "Generalized quantiles as risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edgars Jakobsons & Steven Vanduffel, 2015. "Dependence Uncertainty Bounds for the Expectile of a Portfolio," Risks, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Tadese, Mekonnen & Drapeau, Samuel, 2020. "Relative bound and asymptotic comparison of expectile with respect to expected shortfall," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 387-399.
    3. Samuel Drapeau & Mekonnen Tadese, 2019. "Dual Representation of Expectile based Expected Shortfall and Its Properties," Papers 1911.03245, arXiv.org.
    4. Righi, Marcelo Brutti & Müller, Fernanda Maria & Moresco, Marlon Ruoso, 2025. "A risk measurement approach from risk-averse stochastic optimization of score functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 42-50.
    5. Damiano Rossello, 2022. "Performance measurement with expectiles," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 45(1), pages 343-374, June.
    6. Sainan Zhang & Huifu Xu, 2022. "Insurance premium-based shortfall risk measure induced by cumulative prospect theory," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 703-738, October.
    7. Samuel Drapeau & Mekonnen Tadese, 2019. "Relative Bound and Asymptotic Comparison of Expectile with Respect to Expected Shortfall," Papers 1906.09729, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    8. Jakobsons Edgars, 2016. "Scenario aggregation method for portfolio expectile optimization," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 33(1-2), pages 51-65, September.
    9. Chen, Ouxiang & Hu, Taizhong, 2019. "Extreme-aggregation measures in the RDEU model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 155-163.
    10. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Mohamed Doukali & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2024. "Testing Granger non-causality in expectiles," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 30-51, January.
    11. Said Khalil, 2022. "Expectile-based capital allocation," Working Papers hal-03816525, HAL.
    12. Qinyu Wu & Fan Yang & Ping Zhang, 2023. "Conditional generalized quantiles based on expected utility model and equivalent characterization of properties," Papers 2301.12420, arXiv.org.
    13. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.
    14. Xia Han & Bin Wang & Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2021. "Risk Concentration and the Mean-Expected Shortfall Criterion," Papers 2108.05066, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    15. Zhang, Feipeng & Xu, Yixiong & Fan, Caiyun, 2023. "Nonparametric inference of expectile-based value-at-risk for financial time series with application to risk assessment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Zhenfeng Zou, 2026. "Generalized Optimal Initial Capital and Risk Measures Induced by the Generalized Certainty Equivalent," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Marcelo Brutti Righi, 2018. "A theory for combinations of risk measures," Papers 1807.01977, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    18. Corrado De Vecchi & Max Nendel & Jan Streicher, 2024. "Upper Comonotonicity and Risk Aggregation under Dependence Uncertainty," Papers 2406.19242, arXiv.org.
    19. Roberto Fuentes-Mart'inez & Irene Crimaldi, 2026. "Granger Causality in Expectiles: an M-vine copula test," Papers 2603.23294, arXiv.org.
    20. Ruodu Wang & Yunran Wei, 2020. "Risk functionals with convex level sets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1337-1367, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:226:y:2025:i:c:s0167715225001415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.