IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v112y2016icp79-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Epidemic change tests for the mean of innovations of an AR(1) process

Author

Listed:
  • Markevičiūtė, J.

Abstract

We study a first order autoregressive process with the autoregressive coefficient ϕ=1 or |ϕ|<1. Our aim is to test whether there is an epidemic type change in the mean of innovations with the statistics based on the observations. We use two equivalent Hölderian test statistics: uniform and dyadic increments statistics. We find the limit under null hypothesis of no change, then we establish consistency conditions under alternative.

Suggested Citation

  • Markevičiūtė, J., 2016. "Epidemic change tests for the mean of innovations of an AR(1) process," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 79-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:112:y:2016:i:c:p:79-91
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2016.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715216000262
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2016.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalie Neumeyer & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2009. "Change‐Point Tests for the Error Distribution in Non‐parametric Regression," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(3), pages 518-541, September.
    2. Alfredas Račkauskas & Charles Suquet, 2006. "Testing Epidemic Changes of Infinite Dimensional Parameters," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 111-134, July.
    3. Jarusková, Daniela & Piterbarg, Vladimir I., 2011. "Log-likelihood ratio test for detecting transient change," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(5), pages 552-559, May.
    4. Aston, John A.D. & Kirch, Claudia, 2012. "Detecting and estimating changes in dependent functional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 204-220.
    5. Leonie Selk & Natalie Neumeyer, 2013. "Testing for a Change of the Innovation Distribution in Nonparametric Autoregression: The Sequential Empirical Process Approach," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(4), pages 770-788, December.
    6. Zdeněk Hlávka & Marie Hušková & Claudia Kirch & Simos Meintanis, 2012. "Monitoring changes in the error distribution of autoregressive models based on Fourier methods," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(4), pages 605-634, December.
    7. Gombay, Edit, 1994. "Testing for change-points with rank and sign statistics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 49-55, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lajos Horváth & Gregory Rice, 2014. "Extensions of some classical methods in change point analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 219-255, June.
    2. Diop, Mamadou Lamine & Kengne, William, 2022. "Epidemic change-point detection in general causal time series," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Marie Hušková & Zuzana Prášková, 2014. "Comments on: Extensions of some classical methods in change point analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 265-269, June.
    4. Bucchia, Béatrice & Wendler, Martin, 2017. "Change-point detection and bootstrap for Hilbert space valued random fields," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 344-368.
    5. Horváth, Lajos & Rice, Gregory & Zhao, Yuqian, 2022. "Change point analysis of covariance functions: A weighted cumulative sum approach," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Buddhananda Banerjee & Satyaki Mazumder, 2018. "A more powerful test identifying the change in mean of functional data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(3), pages 691-715, June.
    7. Alfredas Račkauskas & Martin Wendler, 2020. "Convergence of U-processes in Hölder spaces with application to robust detection of a changed segment," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1409-1435, August.
    8. Daniela Jarušková, 2015. "Detecting non-simultaneous changes in means of vectors," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(4), pages 681-700, December.
    9. Holger Dette & Kevin Kokot & Stanislav Volgushev, 2020. "Testing relevant hypotheses in functional time series via self‐normalization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 629-660, July.
    10. Zdeněk Hlávka & Marie Hušková & Simos G. Meintanis, 2020. "Change-point methods for multivariate time-series: paired vectorial observations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1351-1383, August.
    11. Maria Mohr & Natalie Neumeyer, 2021. "Nonparametric volatility change detection," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 529-548, June.
    12. Melanie Birke & Natalie Neumeyer, 2013. "Testing Monotonicity of Regression Functions – An Empirical Process Approach," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(3), pages 438-454, September.
    13. Axel Bücher & Holger Dette & Florian Heinrichs, 2020. "Detecting deviations from second-order stationarity in locally stationary functional time series," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 1055-1094, August.
    14. Gabriela Ciuperca & Zahraa Salloum, 2015. "Empirical likelihood test in a posteriori change-point nonlinear model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(8), pages 919-952, November.
    15. Han Lin Shang & Jiguo Cao & Peijun Sang, 2022. "Stopping time detection of wood panel compression: A functional time‐series approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1205-1224, November.
    16. Claudia Kirch, 2014. "Comments on: Extensions of some classical methods in change point analysis," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 270-275, June.
    17. Max Wornowizki & Roland Fried & Simos G. Meintanis, 2017. "Fourier methods for analyzing piecewise constant volatilities," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 101(3), pages 289-308, July.
    18. Trevor Harris & Bo Li & J. Derek Tucker, 2022. "Scalable multiple changepoint detection for functional data sequences," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), March.
    19. Jaromír Antoch & Daniela Jarušková, 2013. "Testing for multiple change points," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 2161-2183, October.
    20. Ji, Lanpeng & Liu, Peng & Robert, Stephan, 2019. "Tail asymptotic behavior of the supremum of a class of chi-square processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:112:y:2016:i:c:p:79-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.