IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v70y2010i8p1166-1170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

End of life care policies: Do they make a difference in practice?

Author

Listed:
  • Goodridge, Donna

Abstract

Although institutional policies related to care at the end of life (EOL) are a common feature of hospitals, there has been little examination of the ways in which these policies shape the focus and provision of care. The question asked in this study was "What effect do institutional policies relating to care at the EOL have on practice?" Data were drawn from health record reviews of 310 adults who had died in 3 acute care facilities in a major urban centre of a Western Canadian health region. Medical orders relating to care at the end of life were written for the majority of decedents, highlighting the value providers placed on care planning during this time. Relatively few providers, however, followed policy directives regarding use of care plans, terminology or documentation of discussions with patients and families about treatment plans. The findings of this study demonstrate a significant gap between institutional EOL care policies and practice in this health region, challenging institutional decision makers and front-line providers to collaborate more effectively to devise clinically relevant policies that enhance patient care at a particularly vulnerable time of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Goodridge, Donna, 2010. "End of life care policies: Do they make a difference in practice?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1166-1170, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:8:p:1166-1170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(10)00040-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lemiengre, Joke & de Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx & Van Craen, Katleen & Schotsmans, Paul & Gastmans, Chris, 2007. "Institutional ethics policies on medical end-of-life decisions: A literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 131-143, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Close, Eliana & Willmott, Lindy & White, Ben P, 2021. "Regulating voluntary assisted dying practice: A policy analysis from Victoria, Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(11), pages 1455-1474.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Close, Eliana & Willmott, Lindy & White, Ben P, 2021. "Regulating voluntary assisted dying practice: A policy analysis from Victoria, Australia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(11), pages 1455-1474.
    2. Pasman, H. Roeline W. & Wolf, Johanna E. Hanssen-de & Hesselink, Berniek A.M. & van der Heide, Agnes & van der Wal, Gerrit & van der Maas, Paul J. & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D., 2009. "Policy statements and practice guidelines for medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions: Developments in the past decade," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 79-88, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:8:p:1166-1170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.