IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i2p376-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics policies on euthanasia in nursing homes: A survey in Flanders, Belgium

Author

Listed:
  • Lemiengre, Joke
  • Dierckx de Casterlé, Bernadette
  • Verbeke, Geert
  • Van Craen, Katleen
  • Schotsmans, Paul
  • Gastmans, Chris

Abstract

In many European countries there is a public debate about the acceptability and regulation of euthanasia. In 2002, Belgium became the second country after the Netherlands to enact a law on euthanasia. Although euthanasia rarely occurs, the complexity of the clinical-ethical decision making surrounding euthanasia requests and the need for adequate support reported by caregivers, means that healthcare institutions increasingly need to consider how to responsibly handle euthanasia requests. The development of written ethics policies on euthanasia may be important to guarantee and maintain the quality of care for patients requesting euthanasia. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, development, position, and communication of written ethics policies on euthanasia in Flemish nursing homes. Data were obtained through a cross-sectional mail survey of general directors of all Catholic nursing homes in Flanders, Belgium. Of the 737 nursing homes invited to participate, 612 (83%) completed the questionnaire. Of these, only 15% had a written ethics policy on euthanasia. Presence of an ethics committee and membership of an umbrella organization were independent predictors of whether a nursing home had such a written ethics policy. The Act on Euthanasia and euthanasia guidelines advanced by professional organizations were the most frequent reasons (76% and 56%, respectively) and reference sources (92% and 64%, respectively) for developing ethics policies on euthanasia. Development of ethics policies occurred within a multidisciplinary context. In general, Flemish nursing homes applied the Act on Euthanasia restrictively by introducing palliative procedures in addition to legal due care criteria. The policy was communicated to the consulting general practitioner and nurses in 74% and 89% of nursing homes, respectively. Although the overall prevalence of ethics policies on euthanasia was low in Flemish nursing homes, institution administrators displayed growing awareness of bearing responsibility for stimulating dialogue and reflection about how to deal with euthanasia requests within their institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Lemiengre, Joke & Dierckx de Casterlé, Bernadette & Verbeke, Geert & Van Craen, Katleen & Schotsmans, Paul & Gastmans, Chris, 2008. "Ethics policies on euthanasia in nursing homes: A survey in Flanders, Belgium," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 376-386, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:2:p:376-386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00507-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    2. Gastmans, Chris & Lemiengre, Joke & van der Wal, Gerrit & Schotsmans, Paul & Dierckx de Casterle, Bernadette, 2006. "Prevalence and content of written ethics policies on euthanasia in Catholic healthcare institutions in Belgium (Flanders)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 169-178, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hesselink, Berniek A.M. & Pasman, H. Roeline W. & van der Wal, Gerrit & van der Maas, Paul J. & van der Heide, Agnes & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D., 2010. "Development and dissemination of institutional practice guidelines on medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 230-238, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lemiengre, Joke & de Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx & Van Craen, Katleen & Schotsmans, Paul & Gastmans, Chris, 2007. "Institutional ethics policies on medical end-of-life decisions: A literature review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 131-143, October.
    2. Lemiengre, Joke & Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx de & Verbeke, Geert & Guisson, Catherine & Schotsmans, Paul & Gastmans, Chris, 2007. "Ethics policies on euthanasia in hospitals--A survey in Flanders (Belgium)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(2-3), pages 170-180, December.
    3. Sinclair, Craig & Smith, Jessica & Toussaint, Yann & Auret, Kirsten, 2014. "Discussing dying in the diaspora: Attitudes towards advance care planning among first generation Dutch and Italian migrants in rural Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 86-93.
    4. Erwin Stolz & Nathalie Burkert & Franziska Großschädl & Éva Rásky & Willibald J Stronegger & Wolfgang Freidl, 2015. "Determinants of Public Attitudes towards Euthanasia in Adults and Physician-Assisted Death in Neonates in Austria: A National Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Elia Fernández-Martínez & Juan José Fernández-Muñoz & Cristina Romero-Blanco & María Laura Parra-Fernández & María Dolores Onieva-Zafra, 2020. "Spanish Version of the Attitude Towards Euthanasia Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-8, May.
    6. Pasman, H. Roeline W. & Wolf, Johanna E. Hanssen-de & Hesselink, Berniek A.M. & van der Heide, Agnes & van der Wal, Gerrit & van der Maas, Paul J. & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D., 2009. "Policy statements and practice guidelines for medical end-of-life decisions in Dutch health care institutions: Developments in the past decade," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 79-88, September.
    7. Cohen, Joachim & Van Wesemael, Yanna & Smets, Tinne & Bilsen, Johan & Deliens, Luc, 2012. "Cultural differences affecting euthanasia practice in Belgium: One law but different attitudes and practices in Flanders and Wallonia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 845-853.
    8. Maksim Rudnev & Aleksandra Savelkaeva, 2016. "Public Support for the Right to Euthanasia: The Competing Roles of Values and Religiosity Across 35 Nations," HSE Working papers WP BRP 59/PSY/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    9. Eliott, Jaklin A. & Olver, Ian N., 2008. "Dying cancer patients talk about euthanasia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 647-656, August.
    10. Sarah Vilpert & Carmen Borrat-Besson & Gian Domenico Borasio & Jürgen Maurer, 2020. "Associations of end-of-life preferences and trust in institutions with public support for assisted suicide evidence from nationally representative survey data of older adults in Switzerland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Damon Proulx & David A. Savage, 2020. "What Determines End-of-Life Attitudes? Revisiting the Dutch Experience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 1085-1125, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:2:p:376-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.