IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v61y2005i6p1278-1290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexuality after breast cancer treatment: Changes and coping strategies among Japanese survivors

Author

Listed:
  • Takahashi, Miyako
  • Kai, Ichiro

Abstract

Sexuality after a cancer diagnosis has long been neglected in the clinical and research settings in many countries. In particular, research in Asia on sexuality and cancer among women is extremely scarce. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 Japanese women with breast cancer (mean age 42.2 years; median length between surgery and first interview 17 months) to explore their views on sexuality following breast cancer treatment. Analysis using the Grounded Theory approach revealed four major themes: (a) hesitation in resuming sex after treatment, (b) sexual changes after resuming sex, (c) coping attitudes to the changes, and (d) long-term outcomes of the relationship with partners. Contrary to Japanese breast surgeons' optimistic outlooks, the majority of informants referred to the impact of treatment on the physical as well as psychological aspects of their sexuality. Factors that influenced women's experiences included the pace of their psychological and physical recovery after treatment, fear of their partner's negative response, the importance of the sexual relationship for the couple, and their partner's understanding and support. Suggestions for medical professionals on how to support women's sexuality after cancer are discussed with reference to the Japanese socio-cultural and medical context.

Suggested Citation

  • Takahashi, Miyako & Kai, Ichiro, 2005. "Sexuality after breast cancer treatment: Changes and coping strategies among Japanese survivors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(6), pages 1278-1290, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:6:p:1278-1290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00048-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elwyn, Todd S. & D. Fetters, Michael & Gorenflo, Daniel W. & Tsukasa Tsuda, 1998. "Cancer disclosure in Japan: Historical comparisons, current practices," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1151-1163, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Specker Sullivan, Laura, 2017. "Dynamic axes of informed consent in Japan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 159-168.
    2. Hagihara, Akihito & Tarumi, Kimio, 2007. "Association between physicians' communicative behaviors and judges' decisions in lawsuits on negligent care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(2-3), pages 213-222, October.
    3. Mei, Xiao & Tu, Jiong, 2021. "Values, skills, and decision-making: A cultural sociological approach to explaining diagnostic disclosure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:6:p:1278-1290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.