IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v61y2005i11p2460-2465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Sutton, Stephen
  • Rutherford, Celia

Abstract

Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of self-reported cervical screening uptake were investigated among 1307 women in the target age group who participated in two national surveys conducted in Britain in 1999. Evidence for inequalities in screening uptake was mixed. Of the socioeconomic indicators, only age of completed full-time education showed a significant effect in the multivariate analysis. The strong effects of car ownership and housing tenure in the univariate analyses were eliminated by controlling for marital status, which showed a robust association with uptake. Uptake was highest among married and separated women and lowest among single and widowed women. There was no evidence that the effects of marital status and education were mediated by the attitudinal variables. Anticipated embarrassment and attitudes to screening (e.g., "There's no point going for screening if you don't have any symptoms") were significant independent predictors of uptake. These findings suggest that information campaigns need to address feelings of embarrassment and lack of understanding of the rationale for screening and that efforts should be made to encourage single and widowed women to attend.

Suggested Citation

  • Sutton, Stephen & Rutherford, Celia, 2005. "Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(11), pages 2460-2465, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:11:p:2460-2465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00387-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gil Lacruz, Ana Isabel & Gil Lacruz, Marta & Gorgemans, Sophie, 2014. "Female preventive practices: Breast and smear tests," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 135-144.
    2. Brittany McKinnon & Sam Harper & Spencer Moore, 2011. "Decomposing income-related inequality in cervical screening in 67 countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(2), pages 139-152, April.
    3. Edwin van Teijlingen & Jennifer Reid & Janet Shucksmith & Fiona Harris & Kate Philip & Mari Imamura & Janet Tucker & Gillian Penney, 2007. "Embarrassment as a Key Emotion in Young People Talking about Sexual Health," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:11:p:2460-2465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.