IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Use of a visual analogue scale in a daily patient diary: modelling cross-sectional time-series data on health-related quality of life

Listed author(s):
  • Parkin, David
  • Rice, Nigel
  • Jacoby, Ann
  • Doughty, Julie

An economic evaluation of beta interferon therapy collected quality of life data from 62 people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, currently in remission. Each completed a postal questionnaire consisting of the Euroqol EQ-5D questionnaire, the MSQOL-54 (a disease-specific measure incorporating the SF36) and other data including health services use. This was completed at the beginning and end of 6-weeks during which a daily diary was kept. The diary asked about daily activities, symptoms experienced, the impact of symptoms, general health status and current health status using the Euroqol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). The diary had an excellent completion rate, producing data with good face validity. The resulting cross-sectional time-series data provide information about the stability and variability of the EQ VAS in repeated measurement and its sensitivity to health state changes. EQ VAS scores were stable at the population level over time; greater variation in scores was observed between rather than within individuals. Panel data techniques are used to relate EQ VAS scores to recorded symptoms and baseline general health status, paying particular attention to the role of individual heterogeneity and the dynamic nature of responses. The EQ VAS was sensitive to the presence of symptoms, their severity and their type. It is concluded that appropriately analysed panel data can provide insights useful in the measurement of health-related quality of life.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

Volume (Year): 59 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 (July)
Pages: 351-360

in new window

Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:2:p:351-360
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Postal:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:2:p:351-360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.