IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v58y2004i6p1059-1073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A question of place: medical power in rural Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Kenny, Amanda
  • Duckett, Stephen

Abstract

In Australia, like many countries, government, medicine and the community have maintained an interdependent and symbiotic relationship based on mutual resource dependency and reciprocity. The services of medicine have been indispensable to government and the community and in return medicine has achieved power, elitism and financial gain. Traditionally, doctors have controlled and directed medical knowledge in an absolute manner and this has been the basis of increasing power and dominance. There are, however, claims that medicine's power and dominance over the health care system is being eroded by the emergence of major social trends. The corporatization of medicine, manageralism and proletarianization are touted as factors that are increasingly countervailing medical dominance and power. Whilst it could be suggested that as these trends become more firmly established government and the community gain greater discretionary control over how the resources of medicine can be allocated and utilized, this article argues that the geographic and social dimensions of the community in which doctors practice must be considered. Using a qualitative descriptive approach research was conducted in rural Victoria, Australia. The overall aim of the study was to identify the issues that impact upon service delivery in rural hospitals. The most significant issue that emerged related to medical relationships. The results of this research indicate that in this rural area the power of medicine is strengthened and institutionalized by geographically determined resource control. The sustainability of rural communities is linked to the ability of the town to attract and retain the services of a doctor. Crucial shortages of rural doctors provide medicine with a mandate to dictate the way in which medical resources will be allocated and used by hospitals and the community. Organizations that control critical resources are in an extremely powerful position to control others. Doctors in rural Victoria maintain a position of strength and use their power to exert control over the state, the community and the hospital. Although medical power and dominance may be declining in some areas, in rural Victoria it remains firmly entrenched.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenny, Amanda & Duckett, Stephen, 2004. "A question of place: medical power in rural Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 1059-1073, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:6:p:1059-1073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00278-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elise Sullivan & Karen Francis & Desley Hegney, 2010. "Triage, treat and transfer: reconceptualising a rural practice model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1625-1634, June.
    2. Lehoux, Pascale & Daudelin, Geneviève & Poland, Blake & Andrews, Gavin J. & Holmes, Dave, 2007. "Designing a better place for patients: Professional struggles surrounding satellite and mobile dialysis units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1536-1548, October.
    3. Farmer, Jane & Currie, Margaret & Kenny, Amanda & Munoz, Sarah-Anne, 2015. "An exploration of the longer-term impacts of community participation in rural health services design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 64-71.
    4. Lin, Yen-Ju & Tian, Wei-Hua & Chen, Chun-Chih, 2011. "Urbanization and the utilization of outpatient services under National Health Insurance in Taiwan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 236-243.
    5. Kaye Knight & Amanda Kenny & Ruth Endacott, 2016. "From expert generalists to ambiguity masters: using ambiguity tolerance theory to redefine the practice of rural nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1757-1765, June.
    6. Agnieszka Bem & Rafał Siedlecki & Paweł Prędkiewicz & Patrizia Gazzola & Bożena Ryszawska & Paulina Ucieklak-Jeż, 2019. "Hospitals’ Financial Health in Rural and Urban Areas in Poland: Does It Ensure Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Kaye Knight & Amanda Kenny & Ruth Endacott, 2015. "Assessing clinical urgency via telephone in rural Australia," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 201-207, June.
    8. Amanda Kenny & Ann Allenby, 2013. "Barriers to nurses providing psychosocial care in the Australian rural context," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 194-200, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:6:p:1059-1073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.