IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v52y2001i10p1477-1489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient' voices, social movements and the habitus; how psychiatric survivors 'speak out

Author

Listed:
  • Crossley, Michele L.
  • Crossley, Nick

Abstract

What is the 'voice' of the mental health 'user'? This paper seeks to address this question through the presentation of a detailed comparative analysis of two anthologies written by people living with mental 'illness' in the 1950s and 1990s. Using a narrative-style qualitative analysis, the structure and content of the two anthologies is explored. The analysis illustrates the way in which the 'voice' of the mental patient in the 1950s was very different to that of today. The paper then aims to provide a theoretical explanation that accounts for this transformation of voice. Appropriating theoretical concepts from phenomenology and sociology, in particular, Bourdieu's concept of 'habitus', the paper explores the way in which the 'personal' voice of the mental patient is formulated in dialogical relation to wider public and collective movements. These, in turn, connect to broader transformations in the social, economic and health 'fields'.

Suggested Citation

  • Crossley, Michele L. & Crossley, Nick, 2001. "Patient' voices, social movements and the habitus; how psychiatric survivors 'speak out," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 1477-1489, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:10:p:1477-1489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00257-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Epstein, Steven, 2016. "The politics of health mobilization in the United States: The promise and pitfalls of “disease constituencies”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 246-254.
    2. Crossley, Nick, 2006. "The field of psychiatric contention in the UK, 1960-2000," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 552-563, February.
    3. Rabeharisoa, Vololona, 2006. "From representation to mediation: The shaping of collective mobilization on muscular dystrophy in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 564-576, February.
    4. Speed, Ewen, 2006. "Patients, consumers and survivors: A case study of mental health service user discourses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 28-38, January.
    5. Underman, Kelly, 2015. "Playing doctor: Simulation in medical school as affective practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 180-188.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:10:p:1477-1489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.