IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v136-137y2015ip180-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Playing doctor: Simulation in medical school as affective practice

Author

Listed:
  • Underman, Kelly

Abstract

Simulated patient encounters, in which a trained layperson role-plays a patient, have become increasingly important in medical education. One such type is the gynecological teaching associate (GTA), who teaches medical students how to perform the pelvic examination using her own body. This paper considers the role that simulation like the GTA session plays in medical students' professional socialization. Drawn from interviews and archival sources gathered from medical students, medical faculty, and GTAs, this paper explores the tensions between artificiality and authenticity in order to understand how, through pedagogical practice, medical students come to embody medical culture through simulation. This paper uses the theoretical framework of the medical habitus to understand the role of emotion in medical student socialization. It argues that simulation is an example of affective practice: any rehearsal of techniques or styles of expressing, experiencing, or managing emotion that reshape the body's capacity to feel.

Suggested Citation

  • Underman, Kelly, 2015. "Playing doctor: Simulation in medical school as affective practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 136, pages 180-188.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:136-137:y:2015:i::p:180-188
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795361500310X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Brian & Crawford, Paul & Nerlich, Brigitte & Koteyko, Nelya, 2008. "The habitus of hygiene: Discourses of cleanliness and infection control in nursing work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1047-1055, October.
    2. Crossley, Michele L. & Crossley, Nick, 2001. "Patient' voices, social movements and the habitus; how psychiatric survivors 'speak out," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 1477-1489, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crowe, Sophie & Brugha, Ruairi, 2018. "“We've all had patients who've died …”: Narratives of emotion and ideals of competence among junior doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 152-159.
    2. Vinson, Alexandra H. & Underman, Kelly, 2020. "Clinical empathy as emotional labor in medical work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    3. Underman, Kelly & Hirshfield, Laura E., 2016. "Detached concern?: Emotional socialization in twenty-first century medical education," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 94-101.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mackintosh, Nicola & Humphrey, Charlotte & Sandall, Jane, 2014. "The habitus of ‘rescue’ and its significance for implementation of rapid response systems in acute health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 233-242.
    2. Speed, Ewen, 2006. "Patients, consumers and survivors: A case study of mental health service user discourses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 28-38, January.
    3. MacIntosh, Robert & Beech, Nic & Martin, Graeme, 2012. "Dialogues and dialetics: Limits to clinician–manager interaction in healthcare organizations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 332-339.
    4. Epstein, Steven, 2016. "The politics of health mobilization in the United States: The promise and pitfalls of “disease constituencies”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 246-254.
    5. Crossley, Nick, 2006. "The field of psychiatric contention in the UK, 1960-2000," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 552-563, February.
    6. Rabeharisoa, Vololona, 2006. "From representation to mediation: The shaping of collective mobilization on muscular dystrophy in France," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 564-576, February.
    7. Crowe, Sophie & Brugha, Ruairi, 2018. "“We've all had patients who've died …”: Narratives of emotion and ideals of competence among junior doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 152-159.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:136-137:y:2015:i::p:180-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.