IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v46yi4-5p461-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lack of willpower or lack of wherewithal? "Internal" and "external" barriers to changing diet and exercise in a three year follow-up of participants in a health check

Author

Listed:
  • Ziebland, Sue
  • Thorogood, Margaret
  • Yudkin, Pat
  • Jones, Lesley
  • Coulter, Angela

Abstract

The aims of this paper were to assess whether anticipated barriers to change in diet and exercise which were cited before a health check intervention were related to subsequent behaviour changes. In 1989 a health and lifestyle questionnaire was posted to 17,965 people aged 35-64 who were registered with five general practices in Bedfordshire. Taking account of non-contacts, a response rate of 80.3% was achieved and 11,090 people described their exercise and dietary habits. Those expressing an interest in changing each behaviour were asked to identify reasons why change might be difficult. Two types of barriers--"internal" and "external"--were identified. A total of 2205 respondents were invited to attend a health check in Year One and a recheck three years later and 1660 attended. In this subgroup improvement in exercise and diet was examined in relation to the participants' baseline characteristics, including the type of barriers selected. Internal barriers to change (e.g. lack of willpower, too lazy, too busy) were chosen most frequently. In a logistic regression including a range of baseline variables those who selected only internal barriers were less likely to take more exercise (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41, 0.86) than those who cited only external (e.g. no transport, can't afford sports facilities) or mixed barriers to changing. There was a similar but not statistically significant trend for changing diet (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48, 1.28). Those who are aware of external limitations may be better placed to circumvent them. Further research is needed to explore this relationship between type of barrier and behaviour change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziebland, Sue & Thorogood, Margaret & Yudkin, Pat & Jones, Lesley & Coulter, Angela, 0. "Lack of willpower or lack of wherewithal? "Internal" and "external" barriers to changing diet and exercise in a three year follow-up of participants in a health check," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(4-5), pages 461-465, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y::i:4-5:p:461-465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(97)00190-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Duckworth, Angela L. & Gross, James J., 2020. "Behavior change," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 161(S), pages 39-49.
    2. Andre Matthias Müller & Chuen Seng Tan & Anne H. Y. Chu & Rob Martinus Dam & Falk Müller-Riemenschneider, 2019. "Associations between psychological factors and accelerometer-measured physical activity in urban Asian adults," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(5), pages 659-668, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    behaviour change diet exercise;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y::i:4-5:p:461-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.