The end of professionalism?
Increasingly questions are being raised about the ability of many current health reforms to address the challenges that are facing health systems. We investigate this situation by exploring the role of professionalism in the delivery of health services. In contrast to the dominant approach of considering professionalism as a social phenomenon, professionalism is considered as primarily a task-related phenomenon. The characteristics of the task are identified as being high levels of uncertainty and complexity. These characteristics are shown to lead naturally to the key social features that typify professionalism. Hence, the close link between professionalism and the nature of the task is argued. However, health reforms threaten professionalism. They have been based on considerable dissatisfaction with the performance of professionals as well as the emergence of a number of new challenges. In addition, the reforms have been developed without significant consideration of the central role that professionalism has played, and reformers have adopted a simplified view of the task. Thus, the centrality of professionalism has intrinsically been downgraded. However, this simplification can be shown to be inconsistent with the realities and complexities of health service provision, and thus the downgrading of professionalism is unwarranted. This inconsistency generates many of the conflicts and contradictions being reported. The future of health service reform depends on an effective understanding of the nature of the task, recognition of the central role of professionalism and the development of professional and organisational structures that support each other.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 46 (1998)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:46:y:1998:i:1:p:23-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Shamier, Wendy)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.