IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Reversals of fortune? Sex differences in health in childhood and adolescence

Listed author(s):
  • Sweeting, Helen
Registered author(s):

    This paper reviews findings on sex differences in health among children and adolescents, concentrating particularly on the ages 7-15 years. The overall picture is of a gradual emergence of excess morbidity in females over this life stage. In respect of overall levels of chronic illness, higher male rates in childhood are replaced by higher female rates which emerge in early-mid adolescence. This pattern is also seen in an examination of the rates of two common childhood conditions, asthma and migraine/headaches. An excess of psychological disturbance (largely neurotic disorders) among females emerges in early-mid adolescence, in comparison with younger ages where males predominate. Sex differences in the utilization of health services appear to mirror these patterns of excess morbidity. There is also evidence that with increasing age there is a strengthening in the sex patterning of illness behaviour. In contrast to the emphasis which has been given to explaining the emergence of a female excess in psychological disturbance and illness-related behaviours and attitudes during early adolescence, much less attention has been given to the understanding of the excess in physical complaints among females which also arises over this period. The paper suggests that this may be directly related to the relative lowering of their psychological well-being during early adolescence. Longitudinal studies are required in order to answer questions concerning age by sex interactions in respect of morbidity in childhood and adolescence.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 40 (1995)
    Issue (Month): 1 (January)
    Pages: 77-90

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:1:p:77-90
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:40:y:1995:i:1:p:77-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.