IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v382y2025ics0277953625006859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relational dynamite: Engagements with kinship at the interface of donor conception and DNA testing

Author

Listed:
  • Nordqvist, Petra
  • Gilman, Leah
  • Redhead, Caroline
  • Fox, Marie
  • Hudson, Nicky
  • MacCallum, Fiona
  • Frith, Lucy

Abstract

This article investigates how Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing (DTCGT) affects people impacted by donor conception by bringing empirical data on how people in this context respond to a DNA match into conversation with debates on kinship and personal life. Our aim is to conceptually engage with a salient emerging empirical theme, namely that people at the interface of donor conception/DTCGT respond to a (previously unknown) DNA match on a continuum of receptiveness marked by ‘embrace’ at one extreme end, and ‘reject’ at the other. Engaging theoretically with ‘extreme end’ responses, we argue that people in this situation necessarily consider how to navigate and integrate two different forms of kinship: the ‘born and bred’ kinship of their existing everyday relationships, and the ‘accelerated kinship’ with ‘donor connections’ emerging in the wake of a match. We propose that people's responses to a DNA match are shaped by the ways in which strands of their ‘born and bred’ kinship to do with ontology, belonging, relationality, emotionality, power and temporality have mixed into unique, ossified forms over time within their family. Ultimately, we argue that responses are relational, and that a genetic match can operate as ‘relational dynamite’ in families.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordqvist, Petra & Gilman, Leah & Redhead, Caroline & Fox, Marie & Hudson, Nicky & MacCallum, Fiona & Frith, Lucy, 2025. "Relational dynamite: Engagements with kinship at the interface of donor conception and DNA testing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006859
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625006859
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:382:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625006859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.