IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Caesarean section in Britain and the United States 12% or 24%: Is either the right rate?


  • Francome, Colin
  • Savage, Wendy


The rate of caesarean section (CSR) in Great Britain (GB) and the U.S.A., 12% in England in 1989 ascertained from a survey performed by the authors, and 24% according to official U.S. figures, is higher than warranted by the known and agreed obstetric indications for this operation, which suggest a rate of 6-8% would be adequate. It is argued that the fall in perinatal mortality which has occurred over the period during which the CS rate has risen is not the main reason for this fall. The training of obstetricians to deal with anxiety, provision of primary maternity care by appropriately trained midwives and general or family practitioners, and changes in management protocols could cut the CSR. The number of women undergoing surgery every year in the U.K. could be reduced by 20,000 and in the U.S.A. by 470,000 if the rate of 6% were achieved. In studies of midwifery care the CSR is even lower and it is possible that labour proceeds more efficiently if the woman knows her caregivers and labours at home, as in The Netherlands. Although CS is much safer than in the past it is still more likely to result in the death of the woman and has significant morbidity for the woman and economic costs for society.

Suggested Citation

  • Francome, Colin & Savage, Wendy, 1993. "Caesarean section in Britain and the United States 12% or 24%: Is either the right rate?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1199-1218, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:10:p:1199-1218

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Hsu, Kuang-Hung & Liao, Pei-Ju & Hwang, Chorng-Jer, 2008. "Factors affecting Taiwanese women's choice of cesarean section," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 201-209, January.
    2. David H. Peters & Abdo S. Yazbeck & Rashmi R. Sharma & G. N. V. Ramana & Lant H. Pritchett & Adam Wagstaff, 2002. "Better Health Systems for India's Poor : Findings, Analysis, and Options," World Bank Publications, The World Bank, number 14080.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:37:y:1993:i:10:p:1199-1218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.