IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v373y2025ics0277953625001480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does bundling reminders with messages debunking misconceptions improve the demand for preventive health services? A randomized controlled trial among adults with hypertension in Punjab, India

Author

Listed:
  • Favaretti, Caterina
  • Pillai, Vasanthi Subramonia
  • McConnell, Margaret
  • Ali, Mohammed K.
  • Murthy, Seema
  • Chandrasekar, Adithi
  • Yan, Shirley D.
  • Sudharsanan, Nikkil

Abstract

Regular follow-up visits are a crucial component of prevention and care for several important non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Yet evidence across low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) reveals low demand for preventive healthcare visits. While reminders are commonly used to improve follow-up visit attendance, we hypothesized that low demand could also be driven by misconceptions about the need for preventive care. We thus conducted a randomized evaluation of an enhanced reminder intervention that combined a traditional reminder with debunking information aimed at correcting misconceptions around preventive healthcare. We focused specifically on correcting misconceptions about and improving follow-up visit attendance for hypertension among a sample of 463 individuals with uncontrolled blood pressure recruited from two public hospitals in Punjab, India. Our enhanced reminder was highly effective and improved follow-up visit attendance by 12.1 percentage points. Importantly, we found widespread misconceptions about when hypertension care and treatment are needed among participants at baseline. However, our enhanced reminder did not significantly correct these misconceptions, suggesting that the reminder's effect was primarily mediated through its effect on salience rather than belief correction. While our reminder improved preventive care seeking, the results reveal the challenge of changing deeply rooted misconceptions and suggest that there is still significant scope for further improving demand by combining reminders with more effective belief correction strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Favaretti, Caterina & Pillai, Vasanthi Subramonia & McConnell, Margaret & Ali, Mohammed K. & Murthy, Seema & Chandrasekar, Adithi & Yan, Shirley D. & Sudharsanan, Nikkil, 2025. "Does bundling reminders with messages debunking misconceptions improve the demand for preventive health services? A randomized controlled trial among adults with hypertension in Punjab, India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:373:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001480
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625001480
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demand for healthcare services; Debunking; Health-related misconceptions; Randomized controlled trial; Preventive care; India;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:373:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625001480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.