IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v36y1993i7p849-856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speak

Author

Listed:
  • Black, Nick
  • Thompson, Elizabeth

Abstract

Currently, British doctors are being encouraged by government, managers and their professional associations to undertake medical audit. How easy a task will it be to introduce audit? In an attempt to find out, doctors working in general, geriatic and accident and emergency medicine in four district general hospitals were interviewed. Twenty-eight consultants and 34 junior doctors participated. Generally speaking, doctors accepted the need for audit. In this paper we have focussed deliberately on their worries, since it is these which are of most importance in developing better methods of implementation. The 19 obstacles to audit that respondents identified can be grouped into four categories: perceptions of the need for and the role of audit; practical considerations; the effects of audit; and anxieties about the use of audit. In general, criticisms were levelled at the way audit was being implemented rather than at the principles of the approach. While some obstacles could be overcome by simple, practical measures, others will require a change in doctors' knowledge, beliefs and attitudes. The difficulty of achieving such changes should not be underestimated.

Suggested Citation

  • Black, Nick & Thompson, Elizabeth, 1993. "Obstacles to medical audit: British doctors speak," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 849-856, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:7:p:849-856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(93)90077-H
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valdez-Martinez, Edith & Trumbull, Bernardo & Garduno-Espinosa, Juan & Porter, John David Henley, 2005. "Understanding the structure and practices of research ethics committees through research and audit: a study from Mexico," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 56-68, September.
    2. Carmeli, Abraham & Zisu, Malka, 2009. "The relational underpinnings of quality internal auditing in medical clinics in Israel," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 894-902, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:36:y:1993:i:7:p:849-856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.