IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v366y2025ics0277953624011092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success rates and success stories: Staging anticipation on fertility clinic websites in Taiwan, Japan, and the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Chia-Ling
  • Chen, Wei-Hong
  • Robbins, Sam
  • Sakai, Hinata

Abstract

This paper investigates how fertility clinics stage anticipation on their websites to create imagined futures for their potential users. We developed an analytical framework to explore their “tools of futuring,” focusing on two key modes: probabilistic and interpretative. This framework helps identify the strategies used by clinics to convey specific visions of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). Data comprise content analysis of 59 websites in Taiwan, 90 in Japan, and 55 in the UK, focusing on in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2020–2021. Our findings reveal that success rates and success stories dominate the clinic websites, while mentions of risks and failure stories are nearly absent. This indicates that fertility clinics mobilize a particular dimension of anticipation—namely, “hope,”—and marginalize “fear.” In Taiwan, success stories are more prevalent than statistical calculations, highlighting an emphasis on emotional mobilization to attract clients. By comparison, a few clinics in Japan listed miscarriage rates on their websites, a rare practice aimed at presenting risks. Across all three countries, websites commonly highlight “pregnancy rate per embryo transfer” as the primary indicator, which tends to inflate the apparent effectiveness of the technology. However, clinics in the UK more frequently present live birth rates, the ideal metric for prospective users. The strength of regulatory power over fertility clinic websites at least partially explains the national differences in their anticipatory practices and calls for further research in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Chia-Ling & Chen, Wei-Hong & Robbins, Sam & Sakai, Hinata, 2025. "Success rates and success stories: Staging anticipation on fertility clinic websites in Taiwan, Japan, and the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624011092
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624011092
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ziewitz, Malte, 2017. "Experience in action: Moderating care in web-based patient feedback," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 99-108.
    2. Perrotta, Manuela & Hamper, Josie, 2021. "The crafting of hope: Contextualising add-ons in the treatment trajectories of IVF patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. Read, John, 2008. "Schizophrenia, drug companies and the internet," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 99-109, January.
    4. Salant, Talya & Santry, Heena P., 2006. "Internet marketing of bariatric surgery: Contemporary trends in the medicalization of obesity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2445-2457, May.
    5. Assing Hvidt, Elisabeth & Grønning, Anette & Nisbeth Brøgger, Matilde & Møller, Jane Ege & Fage-Butler, Antoinette, 2021. "Multilevel structures and human agency in relation to email consultations: A strong structuration theory analysis of the Danish general practice setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bluth, Natasha P., 2023. "Reframing as recourse: How women approach and initiate the end of fertility treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0074836 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mazanderani, Fadhila & Kirkpatrick, Susan F. & Ziebland, Sue & Locock, Louise & Powell, John, 2021. "Caring for care: Online feedback in the context of public healthcare services," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Biatna Dulbert Tampubolon & Ajun Tri Setyoko, 2019. "Controlling Policies on Fossil Fuels Subsidies to Overcome Climate Change," Energy Economics Letters, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Petersen, Alan & Schermuly, Allegra & Anderson, Alison, 2022. "‘A platform for goodness, not for badness’: The heuristics of hope in patients' evaluations of online health information," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    6. Lupton, Deborah & Jutel, Annemarie, 2015. "‘It's like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 128-135.
    7. Drew, Patricia, 2011. "“But Then I Learned…”: Weight loss surgery patients negotiate surgery discourses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1230-1237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624011092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.