IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v365y2025ics0277953624010207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural stigmatisation of abortion in the health system: Perspectives of abortion care-seekers, providers, managers, and funders in England and Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Footman, Katy

Abstract

Abortion has been legally permitted in England and Wales for over fifty years, yet this health service continues to be stigmatised within the health system. Stigma is a dominant focus of abortion research, but a structural stigma framework is rarely used to understand how abortion stigma is produced at a macro-level. This study explored how structural abortion stigma is produced and experienced in the health systems of England and Wales, and its influence on person-centred care, including choice of abortion methods. Data from in-depth interviews with abortion care-seekers in 2022–23 and from key informant interviews with abortion care providers, managers, and commissioners in 2021 were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. From the perspectives of key informants, structural abortion stigma is produced through the avoidance of abortion by decision-makers, the permitting of conscientious objection, and the exclusion of abortion from mainstream healthcare. These factors create health system pressures which increase abortion service fragility. The resulting vulnerability of abortion services reduces access to person-centred care, including abortion method choice, which can reinforce individual-level stigma. There are tensions between care-seekers’ experiences of specialist abortion care as less stigmatising, while the ‘abortion clinic’ becomes a site of stigma due to its segregation from mainstream healthcare. This research contributes to a structural understanding of abortion stigma by identifying some of the mechanisms through which structural stigma is produced within health system institutions, and how these forms of institutional stigma might be resisted or dismantled. Power is essential to the (re)production of structural stigma within the health system, which can reinforce individual-level stigma for both care-seekers and providers. Restrictions on method choice and the increasing reliance on medication abortion can be a product of structural abortion stigma, and these limitations on method choice can also reproduce stigma at the individual level.

Suggested Citation

  • Footman, Katy, 2025. "Structural stigmatisation of abortion in the health system: Perspectives of abortion care-seekers, providers, managers, and funders in England and Wales," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624010207
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624010207
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117566?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Footman, Katy, 2024. "The illusion of treatment choice in abortion care: A qualitative study of comparative care experiences in England and Wales," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    2. Footman, Katy, 2023. "Structural barriers or patient preference? A mixed methods appraisal of medical abortion use in England and Wales," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Broussard, Kathleen, 2020. "The changing landscape of abortion care: Embodied experiences of structural stigma in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    4. Augustine, Grace L. & Piazza, Alessandro, 2021. "Category Evolution under Conditions of Stigma: The Segregation of Abortion Provision into Specialist Clinics in the United States," OSF Preprints fzqa6, Center for Open Science.
    5. repec:osf:osfxxx:fzqa6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Sorhaindo, Annik Mahalia & Lavelanet, Antonella Francheska, 2022. "Why does abortion stigma matter? A scoping review and hybrid analysis of qualitative evidence illustrating the role of stigma in the quality of abortion care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Footman, Katy, 2024. "The illusion of treatment choice in abortion care: A qualitative study of comparative care experiences in England and Wales," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    2. Bergen, Sadie, 2022. "“The kind of doctor who doesn't believe doctor knows best”: Doctors for Choice and the medical voice in Irish abortion politics, 2002–2018," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    3. Scott, Darius, 2022. "Uncaring landscapes and HIV peer support in the rural Southern United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Berndt, Virginia Kuulei & Bell, Ann V., 2024. "Beyond knowledge: Introducing embodied aversion through the case of contraception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    5. Footman, Katy, 2023. "Structural barriers or patient preference? A mixed methods appraisal of medical abortion use in England and Wales," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    6. Smith-Johnson, Madeline & Alexander, Katherine, 2025. "Gender affirming medical care access: The role of healthcare stereotype threat and social support in a national probability sample of transgender adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
    7. Ramatou Ouedraogo & Shelmith Wanjiru & Moussa L Zan & Clementine Rossier & Onikepe Owolabi & Sherine Athero & Clement Oduor & Martin Bangha & the N-MAS team, 2024. "“I always know she cannot betray me.” Disclosure of abortion and methods of abortion used in informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-22, July.
    8. Ganatra, Bela & Sorhaindo, Annik Mahalia & Cleeve, Amanda & Tunçalp, Özge & Lavelanet, Antonella Francheska, 2025. "Women's experiences of facility-based abortion care: A WHO qualitative evidence synthesis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    9. Kimport, Katrina, 2022. "Reducing the burdens of forced abortion travel: Referrals, financial and emotional support, and opportunities for positive experiences in traveling for third-trimester abortion care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:365:y:2025:i:c:s0277953624010207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.