IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v35y1992i4p557-566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Doctors as managers: Poachers turned gamekeepers?

Author

Listed:
  • Hunter, David J.

Abstract

Doctors in health care systems of different types are coming under increasing pressure to take on active roles in management. Mounting concern among governments over the escalating costs of health care, coupled with a desire to improve the quality of care and render services more responsive to user preferences has resulted in management being viewed as offering an effective means of tackling these issues. Until recently, the favoured strategy was to strengthen management in order to curb doctors' discretionary decision-making. There is now a shift towards creating managers out of doctors with all that this implies for the future shape of health services. There are also issues about the training and development required for a management role, the stratification of roles within the medical profession, and the future status of lay, or non-medical managers. The paper reviews the debate about doctors and managers and their distinctive value bases. It suggests that doctors can be involved in management as managers at two levels--meso and micro--and considers the issues raised at each level. The paper presents an analysis of the wider context in which the debate about doctors as managers is taking place. The main thesis put forward is that far from managers incorporating doctors, the end result may prove to be the other way round with 'provider capture' of the management agenda in health services a distinct possibility. In contrast to managers, doctors retain enormous public respect and support. As long as it is so doctors will remain powerful stakeholders in defining and controlling the shape and range of health services available. Their active involvement in management could lead to a strengthening of their position. It is argued that, paradoxically, this could make it more difficult for governments to challenge doctors' work practices. Medicine's traditional preoccupations and its resilience to change are likely to remain as strong as ever thereby disappointing advocates of a health and social care system located in a broader policy framework which emphasises health gain and a holistic approach to health.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunter, David J., 1992. "Doctors as managers: Poachers turned gamekeepers?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 557-566, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:4:p:557-566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(92)90349-U
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. מחקר - ביטוח לאומי, 1996. "Volume 4," Working Papers 65, National Insurance Institute of Israel.
    2. Mathilde A Berghout & Isabelle N Fabbricotti & Martina Buljac-Samardžić & Carina G J M Hilders, 2017. "Medical leaders or masters?—A systematic review of medical leadership in hospital settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Hendrik Hillen & Holger Pfaff & Antje Hammer, 2017. "The association between transformational leadership in German hospitals and the frequency of events reported as perceived by medical directors," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 499-515, April.
    4. Veronesi, Gianluca & Kirkpatrick, Ian & Vallascas, Francesco, 2013. "Clinicians on the board: What difference does it make?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-155.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:35:y:1992:i:4:p:557-566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.