IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v32y1991i9p1063-1066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnic differences in the experience of pain

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas, V.J.
  • Rose, F.D.

Abstract

Investigations of ethnic differences in pain experience have been largely confined to the hospital or laboratory. Such studies are limited by the potentially confounding effects of the expectation of pain in the former and of little or no pain in the latter. The present investigation overcomes some of these methodological problems by studying ethnic differences in pain experience following ear-piercing. Afro-West Indian, Anglo-Saxon and Asian subjects (n = 84) completed a pain questionnaire and two rating scales after ear-piercing. Half the subjects were told the study was about pain and half that it was concerned with sensation. There were highly significant ethnic differences in pain ratings. The pain condition produced higher ratings than the sensation condition but there were no significant sex differences. The results are discussed in the context of subjects' ratings of their parents' attitudes to minor injury and their own ability to cope with pain. It is argued that investigation of the bases of ethnic differences in pain experience is important in order to develop maximally efficient pain control regimes for all sections of the population.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas, V.J. & Rose, F.D., 1991. "Ethnic differences in the experience of pain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1063-1066, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:9:p:1063-1066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(91)90164-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kastanakis, Minas N. & Magrizos, Solon & Kampouri, Katerina, 2022. "Pain (and pleasure) in marketing and consumption: An integrative literature review and directions for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 189-201.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:32:y:1991:i:9:p:1063-1066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.