IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v298y2022ics0277953622001691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual pharmaceutical citizenship: Exploring biomedicalization in the daily lives of mixed HIV-serostatus couples in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan, Molly
  • Mendelsohn, Joshua B.
  • Daftary, Amrita
  • Yang, Minhui
  • Bullock, Sandra
  • Lebouché, Bertrand
  • Calzavara, Liviana

Abstract

Positive Plus One is the first large-scale mixed methods study of mixed HIV serostatus couples in Canada. We aimed to understand how biomedicalization i.e., a social process of commodification and expansion of the jurisdiction of medicine over health, influenced the everyday relationships of these couples. We completed 51 semi-structured interviews among a purposive sample of HIV-positive (n = 27) and HIV-negative (n = 24) partners in current or past mixed-serostatus relationships. Participants were recruited after completing an online survey where they consented to be re-contacted for qualitative interviews. Participants represented a diversity of sexual orientations, gender identities, and other sociodemographic characteristics. Drawing on inductive thematic analysis to identify patterns within couples, across serostatus and sexual orientations, we argue that everyday lives of mixed-serostatus couples were shaped by biomedical knowledge and enacted through routine adherence to obtain and maintain viral load undetectability. Our findings illustrated the importance of learning biomedical knowledge for mixed-serostatus couples in this study, the empowering influence of undetectable = untransmittable (UU) discourse, and its role in rendering HIV mundane through routine ART adherence. We introduce the concept of ‘dual pharmaceutical citizenship’ to underscore a process by which particular biopolitical and biomedical expectations are fulfilled in mixed-serostatus relationships. These findings have implications for people who do not readily accept or have access to biomedical knowledge, particularly when treatment-as-prevention frames a “right” and “wrong” approach to HIV management. Future studies should focus on couples where at least one partner does not readily accept or have access to biomedical knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan, Molly & Mendelsohn, Joshua B. & Daftary, Amrita & Yang, Minhui & Bullock, Sandra & Lebouché, Bertrand & Calzavara, Liviana, 2022. "Dual pharmaceutical citizenship: Exploring biomedicalization in the daily lives of mixed HIV-serostatus couples in Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:298:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622001691
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953622001691
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aggleton, P. & Parker, R., 2015. "Moving beyond biomedicalization in the HIV response: Implications for community involvement and community leadership among men who have sex with men and transgender people," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(8), pages 1552-1558.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:298:y:2022:i:c:s0277953622001691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.