IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v25y1987i6p605-614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participation: Myths, realities and prognosis

Author

Listed:
  • Brownlea, Arthur

Abstract

The prospects for increased participatory approaches in health arenas has to recognise not only the encouraging developments (e.g. the "rights" legislation, global health program approaches, social action acceptability, growth in community advocacy skills, freedom of information legislation) but also the persistence of some long-standing impediments (e.g. entenched medical dominance, antagonistic bureaucratic cultures, a centralist supremacy, an intractable political economy of health, inhibitory professional paradigms). There are wide variations between societies in the way these developments and impediments are traded off or balanced, ultimately depending upon how such issues as the sharing of knowledge and skills, information access, challenges to power and practics paradigms are being recognised and resolved in specific contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Brownlea, Arthur, 1987. "Participation: Myths, realities and prognosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 605-614, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:6:p:605-614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0277-9536(87)90085-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jan Florin & Anna Ehrenberg & Margareta Ehnfors, 2006. "Patient participation in clinical decision‐making in nursing: a comparative study of nurses’ and patients’ perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(12), pages 1498-1508, December.
    2. Alex Osei-Kojo & Nathan Andrews, 2016. "Questioning the Status Quo: Can Stakeholder Participation Improve Implementation of Small-Scale Mining Laws in Ghana?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, November.
    3. O'Meara, Wendy Prudhomme & Tsofa, Benjamin & Molyneux, Sassy & Goodman, Catherine & McKenzie, F. Ellis, 2011. "Community and facility-level engagement in planning and budgeting for the government health sector - A district perspective from Kenya," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 234-243, March.
    4. Bin Ding & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Dongxiao Gu & Fang Bian & Xuefeng Shao, 2019. "Effect of Patient Participation on Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Inpatient Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Mauro Serapioni & Pedro Lopes Ferreira & Patrícia Antunes, 2014. "Participação em Saúde: Conceitos e Conteúdos," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 40, pages 26-42, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:25:y:1987:i:6:p:605-614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.