IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cohabiting relationships, money and property: The legal backdrop


  • Barlow, Anne


Unlike most European jurisdictions where the law imposes a system of 'community of property', in English law marrying or entering a civil partnership has no legal effect on a couple's property. Neither does cohabitation. However, on relationship breakdown family law provides for redistribution of income and assets between the parties for those divorcing or dissolving their civil partnership at the court's discretion. Yet for separating cohabiting couples, a more rigid property law determines the outcome irrespective of the couple's financial practices during the relationship. At a time when there is a call for greater harmonisation of Family Law within Europe, the English Law Commission are considering reform of the law relating to financial provision for cohabiting couples. Drawing on empirical research into attitudes towards community of property, this article considers how far the current legal treatment of money and relationships remains appropriate to 21st century coupledom.

Suggested Citation

  • Barlow, Anne, 2008. "Cohabiting relationships, money and property: The legal backdrop," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 502-518, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:37:y:2008:i:2:p:502-518

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Raijas, Anu, 2011. "Money management in blended and nuclear families," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 556-563, August.
    2. Kulic, Nevena, 2013. "The type and duration of family unions and income sharing: The implications for women's economic well-being," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 7-15.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:37:y:2008:i:2:p:502-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.