IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v122y2026ics2214804326000625.html

The effect of complex language on the perceived morality of financial instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Max, Raphael
  • Uhl, Matthias

Abstract

Retail participation in equity markets remains low across many advanced economies, despite the economic and social benefits of private investment - particularly amid aging populations and strained pension systems. While limited financial literacy is often cited as a barrier, moral concerns may also deter engagement. This study examines whether the typically high linguistic complexity of financial communication has a detrimental effect on the moral perceptions of the described financial instruments. In a vignette-based experiment with a 2 (simple vs. complex language) × 5 (financial domain) design, participants assessed the comprehensibility of financial product descriptions and the moral concern about the described financial instrument. Results show that complex language reduces perceived understanding and increases moral skepticism toward financial instruments - even when moral content remains unchanged. Simpler language, by contrast, enhances clarity and mitigates moral concerns. These findings suggest that opaque financial language may unintentionally trigger moral resistance and distrust. The study highlights the need for not just better financial literacy, but also for clear and transparent communication to foster trust in finance.

Suggested Citation

  • Max, Raphael & Uhl, Matthias, 2026. "The effect of complex language on the perceived morality of financial instruments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:122:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000625
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000625
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C99 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Other
    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:122:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.