IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v19y2003i1p17-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intuitive vs. analytical decision making: which is preferred?

Author

Listed:
  • Sjöberg, Lennart

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study of preferences for intuitive as against analytical decision making and of judgments in a wide variety of situations. The findings are related to perceived control, and to the risks and chances of negative and positive outcomes of the decisions, respectively. Control was found to be positively related to preference for an intuitive mode of making decisions. It was also found that preference for an intuitive mode of decision making was most pronounced among private consumer decisions, the outcomes of which were also seen by the decision makers as being most accessible to their own influence. In particular, judgments made by professionals not directly affected by the outcome of the decision were regarded as requiring a more analytical approach. These findings are discussed in relation to the frequent claims of the experts to possess a high level of intuitive skill.

Suggested Citation

  • Sjöberg, Lennart, 2003. "Intuitive vs. analytical decision making: which is preferred?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 17-29, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:19:y:2003:i:1:p:17-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522101000410
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:6:y:2011:i:4:p:351-358 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Balazs Aczel & Bence Lukacs & Judit Komlos & Michael R. F. Aitken, 2011. "Unconscious intuition or conscious analysis? Critical questions for the Deliberation-Without-Attention paradigm," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 6(4), pages 351-358, June.
    3. Andersson, Patric & Engelberg, Elisabeth, 2006. "Affective and rational consumer choice modes: The role of intuition, analytical decision-making, and attitudes to money," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2006:13, Stockholm School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:19:y:2003:i:1:p:17-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.