IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v18y2002i1p47-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social networks and organizational similarity: an analysis of similarities in chairperson remuneration among Sweden's publicly traded firms

Author

Listed:
  • Sandell, Rickard

Abstract

This article argues that information about different social networks can supplement more economically based explanations of organizational conduct, thus yielding more precise predictions about organizational behavior. This study finds that firms tend to remunerate their chairpersons more similarly when the firms are part of the same social network. Furthermore, the results show consistently that multiple networks operate as channels of social influence that affect organizational behavior. The implication of the findings is that social embeddedness is a factor that has to be taken seriously in any attempt at explaining the rationale for a firm's conduct in a group of firms belonging to the same system.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandell, Rickard, 2002. "Social networks and organizational similarity: an analysis of similarities in chairperson remuneration among Sweden's publicly traded firms," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 47-64, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:18:y:2002:i:1:p:47-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522100000233
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:18:y:2002:i:1:p:47-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.