IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v69y2018icp460-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing unprofitable passenger rail operations in Japan - Lessons from the experience in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Kurosaki, Fumio
  • Alexandersson, Gunnar

Abstract

Japan implemented a ground-breaking reform in the railway sector in 1987 when it broke up the Japanese National Railways (JNR) into six vertically integrated railway companies. Mainly because of the recent population decrease in local areas, many local rail lines face severe declines in passenger numbers. When it comes to upholding unprofitable public transport, Sweden implemented a radical reform in 1988 by means of vertical separation and decentralisation, and then gradually introduced competitive tendering to procure unprofitable passenger rail services. In this paper, the situation in Japan, and primarily Hokkaido, is presented in some more detail, as well as the situation in Sweden. The study of railway operation and management in the two countries leads to a couple of lessons and implications for sustaining unprofitable but socially beneficial passenger railways. Among the addressed key issues are: 1) establishing the appropriate governance structure that facilitates reaching a better, agreed balance between national government and regional governments; 2) stipulating a standard to select the appropriate transport mode; 3) bearing of the financial responsibility for sustaining specific lines based on an analysis of the benefitting parties.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurosaki, Fumio & Alexandersson, Gunnar, 2018. "Managing unprofitable passenger rail operations in Japan - Lessons from the experience in Sweden," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 460-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:460-469
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885917302524
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fumio Kurosaki, 2013. "Shinkansen Investment before and after JNR Reform," International Transport Forum Discussion Papers 2013/27, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weidong Li & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2019. "Belt and Road Initiative and Railway Sector Efficiency—Application of Networked Benchmarking Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Albalate & Germá Bel, 2015. "La experiencia internacional en alta velocidad ferroviaria," Working Papers 2015-02, FEDEA.
    2. Mu, Rui & de Jong, Martin & Ma, Yongchi & Xi, Bao, 2015. "Trading off public values in High-Speed Rail development in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 66-77.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Railway reform; Vertical separation; Public finances;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • L92 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation
    • L98 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:460-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.