IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cxt/phelrj/v3y2023i2p53-65.html

Marketing development as the basis for improving passenger transportation services at railway stations

Author

Listed:
  • Tetiana Melnyk
  • Oleh Khrystofor

Abstract

Overcoming the losses in auxiliary activities of domestic railway stations and achieving the desired level of customer satisfaction requires the implementation of marketing and the improvement of passenger transportation services based on it. The article identifies the differences between the categories of “transport service” and “transport service provision”, “railway station” and “railway station complex”. A list of the main and additional functions of domestic railway stations is formulated. The existing classifications of railway station services are summarized, and a classification of commercial services is proposed. The main problems in providing additional services for passengers are formulated, and the reasons for their formation are identified. The essence of marketing for railway passenger transportation is presented and its role in overcoming the losses in auxiliary activities of railway stations and increasing customer satisfaction with additional services is substantiated

Suggested Citation

  • Tetiana Melnyk & Oleh Khrystofor, 2023. "Marketing development as the basis for improving passenger transportation services at railway stations," Philosophy, Economics and Law Review Articles, Philosophy, Economics and Law Review, vol. 3(2), pages 53-65, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:53-65
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-53-65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://phelr.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/article_MELNYK++.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.31733/2786-491X-2023-2-53-65?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cxt:phelrj:v:3:y:2023:i:2:p:53-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Philosophy, Economics and Law Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://phelr.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.