IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v39y2013i1p226-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workshop 4: Designing contracts/concessions: What has worked and what has not and why?

Author

Listed:
  • Bray, David
  • Mulley, Corinne

Abstract

A contract establishes a mutual relationship between an authority and an operator. From the point of view of the authority, it is a tactical level mechanism to achieve the strategic objectives of government. Management of contractors translate the requirements of contracts into operational practices to guide the day-to-day work of staff for the delivery of services. Much can go wrong with contracts for the provision of public transport services. Workshop participants identified and ranked 25 potential risk factors. The five most important factors, which relate to objectives, tender assessment, allocation of risks, financial viability and dispute management, were examined drawing on the 11 papers presented to the workshop. Matters that work, that do not and would make the most difference to the success of contracts were identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Bray, David & Mulley, Corinne, 2013. "Workshop 4: Designing contracts/concessions: What has worked and what has not and why?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 226-231.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:39:y:2013:i:1:p:226-231
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885912000893
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanley, John & van de Velde, Didier, 2008. "Risk and reward in public transport contracting," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 20-25, January.
    2. Stanley, John & Longva, Frode, 2010. "Workshop report - A successful contractual setting," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 80-88.
    3. Nash, Chris & Wolanski, Michal, 2010. "Workshop report - Benchmarking the outcome of competitive tendering," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 6-10.
    4. Walters, Jackie & Jansson, Jan Owen, 2008. "Risk and reward in public transportation contracting," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 26-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Faivre d'Arcier, Bruno, 2014. "Measuring the performance of urban public transport in relation to public policy objectives," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 67-76.
    2. Pyddoke, Roger & Lindgren, Hanna, 2018. "Outcomes from new contracts with “strong” incentives for increasing ridership in bus transport in Stockholm," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 197-206.
    3. Wallis, Ian P., 2016. "Demand and service impacts of competition for the market – Australian urban bus case studies," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 330-342.
    4. Andrés Gómez-Lobo & Julio Briones, 2014. "Incentives in Bus Concession Contracts: A Review of Several Experiences in Latin America," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 246-265, March.
    5. Alexandersson, Gunnar & Hultén, Staffan & Jardón, Juan J., 2020. "Hybrid markets in public transport – contract design, performance and conflicts," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Odeck, James & Høyem, Harald, 2021. "The impact of competitive tendering on operational costs and market concentration in public transport: The Norwegian car ferry services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Epstein, Bryan & Givoni, Moshe, 2016. "Analyzing the gap between the QOS demanded by PT users and QOS supplied by service operators," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 622-637.
    3. Andrés Gómez-Lobo & Julio Briones, 2014. "Incentives in Bus Concession Contracts: A Review of Several Experiences in Latin America," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 246-265, March.
    4. Cats, Oded, 2014. "Regularity-driven bus operation: Principles, implementation and business models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 223-230.
    5. Filippini, M. & Koller, M. & Masiero, G., 2015. "Competitive tendering versus performance-based negotiation in Swiss public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 158-168.
    6. Wong, Yale Z. & Hensher, David A., 2018. "The Thredbo story: A journey of competition and ownership in land passenger transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 9-22.
    7. Walters, Jackie, 2020. "Understanding bidder behaviour: The case of the Mamelodi contract," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    8. Sheng, Dian & Meng, Qiang, 2020. "Public bus service contracting: A critical review and future research opportunities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. John Stanley, 2011. "Public Transport Liberalization: Achievements and Future Directions," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Daniel Albalate & Germà Bel & Joan Calzada, 2010. "Urban transport governance reform in Barcelona," IREA Working Papers 201009, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Jun 2010.
    11. Schaaffkamp, Christoph, 2014. "How can customer focus be strengthened in competitive tendering?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 305-314.
    12. Andrea ZATTI, 2011. "Organizational models in European local public transport: is the new paradigm really dominant," Departmental Working Papers 2011-29, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    13. Andrea ZATTI, 2012. "New Organizational Models In European Local Public Transport: From Myth To Reality," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(4), pages 533-559, December.
    14. Walters, Jackie, 2018. "Potential cost implications of contracting risks – the views of bus operators in South Africa," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 235-244.
    15. Paulsson, Alexander & Isaksson, Karolina & Sørensen, Claus Hedegaard & Hrelja, Robert & Rye, Tom & Scholten, Christina, 2018. "Collaboration in public transport planning – Why, how and what?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 377-385.
    16. Pyddoke, Roger & Lindgren, Hanna, 2018. "Outcomes from new contracts with “strong” incentives for increasing ridership in bus transport in Stockholm," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 197-206.
    17. Wegelin, Philipp & von Arx, Widar, 2016. "The impact of alternative governance forms of regional public rail transport on transaction costs. Case evidence from Germany and Switzerland," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 133-142.
    18. Veeneman, Wijnand, 2010. "Changing public transport governance in Dutch metropoles: To tender or not to tender," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 195-203.
    19. Wallis, Ian & Bray, David & Webster, Heather, 2010. "To competitively tender or to negotiate - Weighing up the choices in a mature market," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 89-98.
    20. Tiznado, Ignacio & Galilea, Patricia & Delgado, Felipe & Niehaus, Markus, 2014. "Incentive schemes for bus drivers: The case of the public transit system in Santiago, Chile," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 77-83.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:39:y:2013:i:1:p:226-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.