IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v230y2026ics1364032125013000.html

Physical solutions for hydrogen storage: Technological challenges, safety assessments, and environmental aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Mirshekarzadeh, Tabassom
  • Akbari, Shahin
  • Sharifian, Mohammad
  • Mirshekarzadeh, Arman
  • Salehi, Fatemeh
  • Bijarchi, Mohamad Ali

Abstract

Hydrogen is a crucial energy vector for sustainable and low-carbon systems; however, storage and safety challenges limit its broader adoption. The paper comprehensively reviews the physical hydrogen storage technologies, focusing on safety features and environmental impacts as research gaps. It critically examines pressure- and temperature-based storage, material-based storage, and Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS), evaluating their safety concerns, scientific challenges, and technological advancements. Pressure- and temperature-controlled methods involve storing hydrogen in compressed gas, liquid, or cryo-compressed forms. A novel classification of material-based storage is introduced, encompassing hydrate-based hydrogen storage, Hollow Glass Microspheres (HGMs), and adsorption methods. Large-scale seasonal hydrogen storage in subsurface geological formations, such as salt caverns, depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, aquifers, and hard rock caverns, is also explored. Challenges and future directions of each storage method are analyzed to guide research toward safer and more efficient hydrogen storage solutions. The study also combines a systematic safety risk assessment with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Material-based storage shows promising safety but remains at an early development, whereas pressure- and temperature-based storage dominates the industry despite higher risks. UHS offers large-scale and long-term potential but faces geological and environmental challenges. LCA results indicate that compressed hydrogen has modest energy and emissions, whereas liquefied and cryo-compressed options impose the highest burdens. Material-based approaches show high energy demand and a wide uncertainty. UHS yields the lowest operational energy use, though construction and cushion gas dominate their life-cycle impacts. However, no single technology is universally optimal for all applications, necessitating further research to enhance efficiency and feasibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirshekarzadeh, Tabassom & Akbari, Shahin & Sharifian, Mohammad & Mirshekarzadeh, Arman & Salehi, Fatemeh & Bijarchi, Mohamad Ali, 2026. "Physical solutions for hydrogen storage: Technological challenges, safety assessments, and environmental aspects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:230:y:2026:i:c:s1364032125013000
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.116627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125013000
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:230:y:2026:i:c:s1364032125013000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.