IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v13y2009i8p2079-2087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of sustainable development in countries of Southeastern Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Ivanovic, Olja D. Munitlak
  • Golusin, Mirjana T.
  • Dodic, Sinisa N.
  • Dodic, Jelena M.

Abstract

Countries of SE Europe are at very beginning of planning of their development in accordance with theoretical concept of sustainable development. Sustainable development is defined as the basic imperative and the only model of development in a longer period of time. The basic indicators of sustainable development represent a very useful and quality way for measuring and monitoring the state of sustainable development, as in every country individually so as in the regions and globally as a whole. Values of the indicators of all four subsystems in observed countries are within expectation. Also the current level of development of every country separately is taken into account and in accordance to that it is defined the current position of any country in respect to its international requests. The special value is given by the comparison of obtained results of the state in the developed EU countries, according to which there is an impression of equal degree of sustainable development in France and Germany, whereas the data regarding the state of sustainable development in Greece and at Slovenia has been improved between two analysis. Taking into account the results of the previous and current research there is a clear need for regular observation of the state of every indicator individually but also the need to observe the relationship among them as a whole. The special attention needs to be given to the intensive monitoring of indicators of economic and ecological subsystem. The research showed, among other things, to the fragile relationship of values of indicators of economic and ecological subsystem, by which any change in values of one indicator consequently leads to the changes in the final result. Both conducted researches point to the fact that the value of the mentioned indicators changes at the fastest pace.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivanovic, Olja D. Munitlak & Golusin, Mirjana T. & Dodic, Sinisa N. & Dodic, Jelena M., 2009. "Perspectives of sustainable development in countries of Southeastern Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 2079-2087, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:13:y:2009:i:8:p:2079-2087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364-0321(09)00062-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Toumi, Olfa & Le Gallo, Julie & Ben Rejeb, Jaleleddine, 2017. "Assessment of Latin American sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 878-885.
    2. Qingling Shi & Xiangzheng Deng & Chenchen Shi & Shiyi Chen, 2015. "Exploration of the Intersectoral Relations Based on Input-Output Tables in the Inland River Basin of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Golusin, Mirjana & Ivanovic, Olja Munitlak & Teodorovic, Natasa, 2011. "The review of the achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe--The use of linear regression method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 766-772, January.
    4. Gabriela Cecilia Stanciulescu & Daniel Bulin, 2012. "Indicators of Sustainable Development - A Comparative Analysis Between Bulgaria and Romania in European Context," International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(2), pages 91-98, April.
    5. Mirjana Golušin & Olja Munitlak Ivanovic & Simonida Vucenov, 2012. "Sustainable energy management - a prerequisite for the realization Kyoto Protocol," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 1(2), pages 24-34, September.
    6. de Almeida, Claudinei & Bariccatti, Reinaldo Aparecido & Frare, Laercio Mantovani & Camargo Nogueira, Carlos Eduardo & Mondardo, Andrei Antônio & Contini, Leonardo & Gomes, Gláucio José & Rovaris, Sol, 2017. "Analysis of the socio-economic feasibility of the implementation of an agro-energy condominium in western Paraná – Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 601-608.
    7. Golusin, Mirjana & Tesic, Zdravko & Ostojic, Aleksandar, 2010. "The analysis of the renewable energy production sector in Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1477-1483, June.
    8. Delia Popescu & Andreea Saseanu & Daniel Bulin & Grazia Calabro, 2014. "Econometric Models in Romanian Tourism under the Impact of Sustainable Development," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(Special 8), pages 1063-1063, August.
    9. Tesanovic, Dragan & Vuksanovic, Nikola & Kalenjuk, Bojana & Vukic, Milorad & Gagic, Snjezana, 2013. "Danube Tourist Ships As An Opportunity For Export Of Agricultural And Food Products," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 60(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Marcin K. Widomski & Anna Musz-Pomorska, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Rural Areas in Poland since 2004 in the Light of Sustainability Indicators," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, February.
    11. repec:sph:rjedep:v:1:y:2012:i:2:p:27-38 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Aleksandras Vytautas Rutkauskas, 2012. "Using Sustainability Engineering to Gain Universal Sustainability Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Golusin, Mirjana & Ostojic, Aleksandar & Latinovic, Smilja & Jandric, Maja & Ivanovic, Olja Munitlak, 2012. "Review of the economic viability of investing and exploiting biogas electricity plant – Case study Vizelj, Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1127-1134.
    14. Golusin, Mirjana & Munitlak Ivanovic, Olja, 2011. "Kyoto Protocol implementation in Serbia as precognition of sustainable energetic and economic development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2800-2807, May.
    15. Mihic, Svetlana & Golusin, Mirjana & Mihajlovic, Milan, 2011. "Policy and promotion of sustainable inland waterway transport in Europe - Danube River," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 1801-1809, May.
    16. Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Ana Ursu & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Marius Mihai Micu, 2021. "Sustainable Development of the Rural Areas from Romania: Development of a Digital Tool to Generate Adapted Solutions at Local Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:13:y:2009:i:8:p:2079-2087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.