IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v260y2025ics0951832025002261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Integrity Level (SIL) evaluation of safety instrumented systems considering competing failure modes and subsystem priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Cheraghi, Morteza
  • Taghipour, Sharareh

Abstract

Safety Integrity Level (SIL) is a crucial measure of the safety performance of Safety Instrumented Systems (SISs), reflecting their ability to reduce risk. However, SIL analysis has often overlooked the impact of competing failure modes and subsystem priorities within SISs. This paper introduces a novel probabilistic model for evaluating the SIL of safety functions that incorporates these critical aspects. The model calculates the time-dependent Probability of (dangerous) Failure on Demand (PFD) and Probability of Failing Safely (PFS) at the component, subsystem, and system levels. The average PFD (PFDavg) and SIL are calculated considering both planned and unplanned proof tests. The proposed model is validated through Monte Carlo simulations and applied to a safety system designed to protect a process vessel from high-pressure hazards. A comparative analysis with existing models demonstrates that competing failure modes and subsystem priorities significantly influence PFD, PFS, PFDavg, and consequently SIL, especially in systems with longer proof test intervals and higher Safe Failure Fractions (SFFs).

Suggested Citation

  • Cheraghi, Morteza & Taghipour, Sharareh, 2025. "Safety Integrity Level (SIL) evaluation of safety instrumented systems considering competing failure modes and subsystem priorities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:260:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025002261
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:260:y:2025:i:c:s0951832025002261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.